Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

BROOKDALE CENTRAL WHITTIERLicense 1976069452 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: "Staff did not inform authorized representative of resident's fall resulting in an injury." Based on record review and interviews conducted the findings indicate that on October 10, 2021 former resident (R1) sustained a fall inside the resident's room resulting in bruising and scrapes to the left knee. Picture evidence was obtained. According to staff, R1 had a total of two (2) falls dated [10/10/21 & 10/27/21]. The fall dated 10/10/21 was not reported to Community Care Licensing (CCL). In addition, the authorized representative did not notification via phone call because the phone number listed on R1's face sheet was incorrect, and staff were not able to decipher the exact numbers listed on the emergency contact information document. Resident (R1's) authorized representative became aware of the 10/10/21 fall during a visit shortly after the incident. The authorized representative and med-tech staff (S5) discovered the phone number listed was incorrect. Therefore, confirmed the authorized representative did not receive phone call notification of the fall injury. The second fall dated 10/27/21 was reported to CCL and authorized representative. Caregiver staff notified med-tech staff (S3) who called 911 Emergency. Resident (R1) was transported to Whittier Presbyterian Hospital for evaluation. The resident returned back to the facility the same day. Allegation: "Staff would not itemize the resident's bill." Based on record review and interviews conducted the findings indicate that on September 23, 2021 former resident (R1) docu-signed the "Residency Agreement" that includes a price schedule for services and outlines charges. A "Community Fee of $2,500" and "Basic Service Rate of $1,760" was noted. No additional charges/fees were observed under the "Personal Service Rate" line item; which would include additional care services like bathing and/or incontinence care assistance. It is alleged that resident (R1's) authorized representative received an invoice bill statement with charges that were not agreed upon or authorized. Resident (R1's) family called the facilities several times requesting an explanation of additional charges and a copy of an itemized bill, but did not receive calls back. The itemized bill was provided over 1 week later until the authorized representative went in person to the facility. However, an explanation of the charges was not provided at the time of the visit. The itemized bill listed additional "Personal Service Rate" charges in the amounts of [Showering $128.00 and Bathroom Assist $769.00] totaling an additional $897.00 per month in fees in addition to rent fees. See LIC 9099 for report continuation. According to staff interviews, resident (R1's) family agreed to the shared room rate and a "Personal Service Rate" fee of $128 dollars for shower/bathing assistance. However, the Residency Agreement obtained did not list additional "Personal Service Rate" fees. The Executive Director, Health and Wellness Director, Sales Manager, Business Office Manager were interviewed and all acknowledged that the Residency Agreement does not list any additional charges aside from rent fees. Former resident (R1) no longer resides at the facility and was not interviewed; only R1's authorized representative was interviewed. Supportive document evidence was obtained. Based on record review and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SU BST ANTIATED . Deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Health and Safety Code Chapter 3.2 Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly, Article 02.5 Resident's Bill of Rights & Title 22, Division 6 Chapter 8 Article 04. Operating Requirements. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Barbara Tyler. A copy of the report an appeal rights were provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.269(a)(21)Type B

    Enumerated rights; severability. Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: To have prompt access to review all of their records and to purchase photocopies. Photocopied records shall be promptly provided, not to exceed two business days, at a cost not to exceed the community standard for photocopies. This requirement was not met by evidence of: Based on interview and record review resident (R1's) itemized bill records were not provided to authorized representative within two business days. Facility provided a copy of the itemized bill until Nov 4, approximately 2 weeks after phone request was made. This poses a potential health and safety risk.

  • 87211(a)(1)(D)Type B

    Reporting Requirements. A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified ... below. Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, such as psychological abuse of a resident by staff or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident. This requirement was not met by evidence of: On 10/10/21 R1 sustained a fall resulting in scrapes and bruising to the kneee, which was not reported to authorized representive or Community Care Licensing. This poses a potential health and safety risk.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 17, 2021 inspection of BROOKDALE CENTRAL WHITTIER?

This was a complaint inspection of BROOKDALE CENTRAL WHITTIER on December 17, 2021. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to BROOKDALE CENTRAL WHITTIER on December 17, 2021?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "Enumerated rights; severability. Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the followin..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.