Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

JASMIN TERRACE AT EL MOLINOLicense 1976076551 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 1/10/23 LPA requested physician's report dated and hospice documents for Grigmar Hospice Care. On 1/25/23 LPA delivered findings for the above allegation(s). The investigation consisted of the following: Regarding allegation: Resident suffered a fracture while in care. It is alleged a left hip fracture involving R1 resulted on a serious bodily injury. Interviews revealed that on 2/23/21 R1's family member visited at around 5:00pm and found R1 in gery chair with a robe on and staff was in the bathroom at the time of the visit. Family member notified administrator of incident. At 7:40pm family member informed facility staff that R1 had pain in left hip, facility staff notified family member that R1 had not have any falls or injuries. R1's physician was at the facility checking other residents and around 7:40pm was called in to check in on R1 and evaluated R1. Physician at that moment did not think there was a fracture, however physician ordered an x-ray to determine if there was a fracture. On 2/24/21 at 12:10am facility received x-ray results noting "acute left hip fracture". On 2/24/21, R1 was taken to the hospital for treatment. R1 was under Grigmar Hospice care at the time. Hospice notes dated 2/23/21 at 9:10pm note R1 had swelling of the left hip and showed facial grimace when moving or lifting left leg. Administrator conducted an internal investigation on 2/24/21 and did not find evidence that S1's neglect or actions caused R1 to sustain a hip fracture. Administrator also stated not observing any bruising or evidence of a fracture on 2/23/21. Administrator advised that staff are to conduct a 2 person assist when showering R1 and it was discovered S1 conducted the shower alone on 2/23/21. R1 was unable to be interviewed due to R1's cognitive skills. Interview with S1 revealed, S1 stated staff is to utilize a 2 person assist when showering the residents. However, on 2/23/22 S1 did not ask for assistance to provide R1's shower. Documents review revealed R1 has a history of hip fracture and osteoporosis per physician's report dated 3/2/21. Radiology report dated 2/23/21 notes an acute left hip fracture. Based on interviews and review of documentation regarding R1, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. ***An immediate Civil Penalty of $500.00 is being issued today. Refer to LIC 421IM*** An exit interview was conducted with Virginia Garcia Administrator and a copy of this report, LIC 809D, and appeal rights were provided. On 1/10/23 LPA requested physician's report dated and hospice documents for Grigmar Hospice Care. On 3/18/23 LPA delivered findings for the above allegation(s). The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility fail to notify responsible party of change in condition. It is alleged family member was not notify of fracture upon x-ray results were received. Responsible party stated that from 2/23/21 to 2/24/21 between 11:00pm to 8:30am was not notify of x-ray results or provided an update on R1's change in condition. Documents review revealed facility's flex notes dated 2/24/21- 12:10am note facility received x-ray results noting "acute left hip fracture". Upon receiving the results facility staff contacted physician to notify the x-ray results and physician requested facility notified responsible party. Per facility's notes staff left a voice message for R1's responsible party, notifying to contact the physician in the morning of 2/24/21 as requested by the physician to discuss R1's treatment options. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Regarding allegation: Facility has insufficient staff. It is alleged facility does not have sufficient staff to provide care to the residents. During interviews conducted administrator stated that on 2/23/21 S1 was to provide shower with a 2 person assist and staff did not requested assistance, the incident would have resulted in a third disciplinary notice if S1 had not resigned. S2 who has provided consistent care for R1 stated to have not conducted transfers for R1 around 2/23/21. However S2 stated, whenever needing to transfer R1 out of bed S2 has always provided transfer with a 2 person assist. On 2/23/21 S1 stated to have proceeded to provide shower without requesting assistance from other staff. Documents review revealed February's caregiver schedule for 2/23/21, notes 8 caregivers on duty for the morning shift, 7 caregivers on duty in the evening shift, and 4 caregivers in the night shift. Per administrator during the morning shift each caregiver was providing care for about 12 residents and during the evening shift each caregiver was assigned to at least 15 residents for care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview was conducted with Virginia Garcia Administrator and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(1)Type A

    Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons.This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on documents review licensee did not ensure S2 follow residents rights by using R1's private bathroom which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to the persons in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(2)Type A

    87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities shall...:(2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment.This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews, and documents reviewed the licensee failed to ensure R1 did not sustained a hip fracture while in care which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights to the persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 25, 2023 inspection of JASMIN TERRACE AT EL MOLINO?

This was a complaint inspection of JASMIN TERRACE AT EL MOLINO on January 25, 2023. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to JASMIN TERRACE AT EL MOLINO on January 25, 2023?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall h..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.