Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CENTINELA ASSISTED LIVING CENTRELicense 1976077181 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Facility staff administered unprescribed medication to the resident. It is alleged the facility staff administered unprescribed medication to the resident. Based on LPA's records review, Resident #1 was admitted at the facility on 6/8/2018. Preplacement record shows Resident #1 needs help with his medication. According to the Medical Record/Physician’s Report, Resident #1 has dementia; not capable of dispensing his own medication; and not capable of medical decision due to his dementia; a list of his active prescribed medications does not include melatonin. Resident #1’s Medication Administration Record dated 6/1/2021-6/31/2021 does not show Melatonin as one of his prescribed medications. There is no record that melatonin was prescribed to Resident #1 by his doctor. Per LPA’s review of the alleged perpetrator’s (Staff #3) personnel record, she was hired on 4/6/2020 and completed eight hours of hands-on shadowing training and eight hours of other training or instructions. During LPA’s interview, Resident #1, who is the alleged victim, willingly showed up for interview but refused to answer the questions. LPA was unable to obtain information from him. Residents #2-#10 stated they were not given unprescribed medications and have not heard any other residents given or administered unprescribed medications. However, the Administrator (Staff #1) and the Director of Social Services (Staff #2) admitted that Resident #1 was given two white sleeping pills called melatonin (3 mg) not prescribed to him by this doctor. An incident report dated 7/2/2021 and interview with Staff #1 indicate that a Medication Technician (Staff #3) administered two tablets of melatonin on 6/30/2021 and soon later Resident #1 experienced a side effect that sounds like a hallucination. According to facility’s narrative charting, Staff #3 administered the melatonin to Resident #1 because she was not aware that melatonin is not a house medication. Report continued in LIC 9099C LPA attempted to interview Staff #3 over the telephone, but Staff #3 told LPA that she was not available for interview due to a personal reason. LPA was not able to obtain statements from Staff #3. Staff #1 stated she gave Staff #3 an in-service training on 7/2/2021 regarding mismanagement of medications. LPA’s interview with Resident #1’s Power of Attorney Representative (Witness #1) revealed that Resident #1 experienced a side effect of visual hallucination after taking the melatonin. Witness #1 stated Resident #1 informed her that in his hallucination, he felt like he turned white like a ghost then turned into a black man; he had bumps on his skin, he felt like he was beaten up, and his eyes were swollen. The interviews and records review concur with the above allegation. Based on LPA’s observations, interviews, and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA observed the following deficiency and issued a citation. An interview was conducted with Gwendolyn Craig, the Administrator, and a hard copy was provided along with Appeal rights.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(d)(1)(2)Type A

    (d) If the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for a prescription or nonprescription PRN medication, and is unable to communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff designated by the licensee, shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration provided all of the following requirements are met:(1) Facility staff shall contact the resident's physician prior to each dose, describe the resident's symptoms, and receive direction to assist the resident in self-administration of that dose of medication.(2)The date and time of each contact with the physician, and the physician's directions, shall be documented and maintained in the resident's facility record. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's observations, interviews and records review, licensee failed to ensure staff administers nonprescription PRN medications according to regulations above. Administrator admitted that Staff #3 administered unprescribed melatonin to Resident #1 without contacting resident's physician. The administered medication caused Resident #1 a side effect of hallucination.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 27, 2021 inspection of CENTINELA ASSISTED LIVING CENTRE?

This was a complaint inspection of CENTINELA ASSISTED LIVING CENTRE on July 27, 2021. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to CENTINELA ASSISTED LIVING CENTRE on July 27, 2021?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "(d) If the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for a prescription or nonprescription PRN medication, and is..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.