Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Facility food is cold. It is alleged the facility food is cold. Based on record review, the Admission Agreement shows the victim was admitted to the facility on August 14, 2020. The department attempted to interview eleven residents (#1-#11); nine (9) residents were available but two (2) residents were not able to provide feedback. Resident (#9) refused to respond, while Resident (#11) was unavailable during the interview. During LPA’s interview, Resident #1, who is the alleged victim, stated that the facility food being cold is not his major concern. Resident #1 denied the food is cold and stated the food and the service have been better. Based on LPA’s interviews, five (5) Residents (#3, #4, #5, #8, and #10) denied the facility food is served cold while it is supposed to be hot. Two residents (#2 and #7) stated the food is sometimes served cold while it is supposed to be hot, but they don’t have any complaints. Resident #6 stated the food is always cold. Staff #1-#3 stated the food that is supposed to be hot is served hot/warm. They stated that the food is plated while it’s hot and kept in a thermal warmer to keep the food warm/hot. Staff #1 and #2 disclosed only Resident #11 continuously complains that food is cold. Staff #1 and #2 mentioned that the facility provided a microwave to Resident #11 in his bedroom, yet he still complains. They declared that Resident #11 frequently buys food and does not often eat the facility food. Based on LPA’s observations, interviews, and records review, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation mentioned above. Based on information gathered, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegations, “Facility food is cold.” Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted. A hard copy of the report was provided to Administrator Gwendolyn Craig.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87217(h)Type B

    This report is being amended to correct the Section Number cited in Title 22.87217 Safeguards for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Valuables (h) Immediately upon admission, residents' cash resources entrusted to the licensee and not kept in the licensed facility shall be deposited in any type of bank, savings and loan or credit union account, which is maintained separate from the personal or business accounts of the licensee, provided that the account title clearly notes that it is residents' money and the resident has access to the money upon demand to the licensee. This requirement is evidenced by: Based on observation, records review and interviews, The administrator admitted twelve (12) residents including Resident #1 were affected by the Check system error and facility was not able to release their cash resources for July 2021 until July 30, 2021. The facility withheld Resident #1's monies in the amount of $200 dated June 22, 2021, and $138.00 dated June 23, 2021, from the County of Los Angeles, Public Administration – Public Guardian. Staff #1 stated the facility does not have available cash on hand to give to the residents, and there are no alternatives to obtain cash other than through the RFMS system. This poses a potential Health, Safety and/or Rights risk to residents in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 6, 2021 inspection of CENTINELA ASSISTED LIVING CENTRE?

This was a complaint inspection of CENTINELA ASSISTED LIVING CENTRE on August 6, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CENTINELA ASSISTED LIVING CENTRE on August 6, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.