complaint·July 3, 2024

Interview with R1's case manager revealed that the facility did in fact report R1's relocation. R1's case manager had no issue with facility reporting. Interview with F1 at 10:50 p.m. on 05/26/24 revealed they were also notified of R2's relocation. F1 had issue with the relocation itself as they claimed to be responsible for R2's medical decisions. Interview with the ED at 4:15 pm. on 05/29/24 confirmed the facility did in fact notify R1's case manager of R1's relocation and F1 of R2's relocation. The ED and S2 stated the legal document which F1 submitted to show authority over R2's medical decisions was expired. Record review of that legal document revealed it expired on 05/04/24. Record review of an incident report revealed R2 was admitted to Encino Hospital on 05/23/24 after consultation with a wound nurse determined R2 required medical attention. The incident report also noted F1 was notified of the relocation. Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility properly notified the proper individuals and agencies of resident relocations. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.