Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from 9099 The Discharge summary from SNF, dated 04/20/2021, notated an observation of red and dry skin on the Mid-back of R1 however, there was no indication of scabies. Facility did not conduct a pre-appraisal on R1 prior to accepting R1 back to the facility though, on 04/22/2021, Staff 1 (S1), informed Administrator Lori McKay of redness on R1’s back. McKay informed R1’s primary care physician and awaited instructions. On 04/23/2021, R1 went to R1s dialysis appointment, at which time R1 was transported back to a local hospital due to low blood pressure. R1 did not return to the facility. LPA interview with the family member of R1 revealed that R1 never complained of any symptoms related to scabies while residing at the facility. Based on R1’s Physician Report dated 04/19/2021, R1 is able to communicate R1s needs and able to follow instructions. Further interview with R1s family member revealed that R1 was in communication with the family member and that R1 was mostly impacted with symptoms of scabies while residing at the SNF. Per the Reporting Party (RP) it was unclear where R1 was infected with scabies, however, upon admission to the hospital on 04/23/2021, R1 was present with scale and excoriations all over R1s trunk and extremities with pruritus. Based on information gathered during this and previous visits, even though R1 was admitted back to the hospital with scabies on 04/23/2021, the department does not have sufficient evidence to determine that R1 contracted scabies while in care of the facility. Therefore, the allegation that resident in care has scabies has been deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report issued.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87463(a)(3)Type B

    87463(a)(3) Reappraisals. (a) Thepre-admission appraisal shall be updated, inwriting as frequently as necessary to notesignificant changes...(3) Any illness, injury,trauma, or change in the health care needs ofthe resident that results in a circumstance or condition...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, licensee did not comply with the section cited above as R1's reappraisal was not updated to reflect change of condition after being discharged from the hospital, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 3, 2023 inspection of RESIDENCES AT ROYAL BELLINGHAM, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of RESIDENCES AT ROYAL BELLINGHAM, THE on March 3, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to RESIDENCES AT ROYAL BELLINGHAM, THE on March 3, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.