Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On today's visit, LPA Yee conducted another interview with the Executive Director at 10:34am and Staff #1 at 9:42am to obtain additional information and clarification for the information obtained by LPA Camara on the initial visit conducted on 7/20/22 and Staff #2 at 11:14am. Family #1 was also contacted via telephone at 10:19am to obtain additional information. Per information obtained from interviews conducted regarding allegation #1 - staff caused injuries to resident, It was alleged that when the facility staff cut Resident #1's beard they left cuts on the resident. Per interviews conducted with the facility staff/caregiver and Family #1, no one observed any cuts on Resident #1. The facility uses an electric razor that has a flat guard that prevents any facial cuts from happening. The razor also does not work if the guard is open. Resident #1 never informed staff and was never heard complaining about any facial cuts. LPA Yee was not able to locate anyone who could corroborate that Resident #1 had cuts. Regarding Allegation #2 - facility did not prevent resident from being financially abused. Per interviews conducted, Resident #1 alleged that a family member, Family #1, who has power of attorney over the resident, was financially abusing the resident by taking funds from Resident #1's accounts without permission. Per information obtained from interviews, Resident #1 met someone online and claims to be in love and wants to move to the Philippines to be with that person. Resident#1 has been sending funds to the individual and not paying the rent, leaving the family to come up with the money for rent. The family and the facility staff believe that it is a scam and are trying to prevent more funds from going to the person online. Resident#1 believes that the facility is in cahoots with the family. Per Family #1, the family have their own mortgages and financial obligations and they expect Resident #1 to contribute to the facility rent and expenses. Resident #1 had added Family #1 to a new bank account so that Family #1 could assist with managing the resident's money. The monies taken out of Resident's account were used to cover a small portion of Resident #1's rent and expenses and a large portion of the rent was supplemented by Family #1. Family #1 was ensuring that Resident #1 had a place to live and not financially abusing Resident #1. Per Family#1, the resident has more money in the bank account since they have been managing Resident #1's finances. Continued on LIC9099-C Regarding Allegation #3 - Resident is not given a shower. Per interviews conducted, Resident #1 is mostly bed bound and needs dialysis treatment 3 times a week. Resident #1 is given bed baths 3 times a week before going for the dialysis treatments. Per interview with Family #1, they visit regularly and have not observed Resident #1 being neglected or dirty. Resident #1 has had a couple of strokes and looks like someone would in the facility without the use of an arm. Resident #1 gets occasional haircuts and hair is sometimes not combed. Per interview with the Staff #2, Resident #1 would be given a shower or bed bath prior to going to dialysis and no resident goes 2 months without being bathed. Services provided to the residents are also documented on the facility's tracking system. A copy of the report was obtained. Per Staff #1, when Resident #1 was counseled by staff and family not to send funds to the person Resident #1 had met online, Resident #1 would have behavior issues and would refuse to bath or eat. Staff would encourage resident to take showers or bed baths. Based on the information obtained by LPA Camara on the 7/20/22 visit and during today's visit, LPA Yee was not able to establish conclusively that the above allegations had any merits. Therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview was conducted with Joey Vitug and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 14, 2023 inspection of RESIDENCES AT ROYAL BELLINGHAM, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of RESIDENCES AT ROYAL BELLINGHAM, THE on June 14, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to RESIDENCES AT ROYAL BELLINGHAM, THE on June 14, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.