Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Page 2... On the allegation that ‘Staff is emotionally abusing resident’, it is the reporting’s party concern that the resident is being bullied by a staff (S1) at the facility, and the bullying is escalating. The RP stated that the R1 stated to the RP that S1 has told R1 to be ‘quiet’ and ‘shut up’ in front of other people in the lobby. RP stated that they were reporting what R1 reported to them, and that they have not witnessed the bullying, or the emotional abuse. The RP reported the incident because R1 appeared to be depressed and was crying. Furthermore, RP stated that when they asked R1 why they thought the bulling was happening, the R1 stated that they ‘did not know why’, and that they felt that S1 does not like R1. The LPA interviewed R1, and the interview revealed R1 felt that S1 does not like R1. When asked why they felt S1 did not like R1, R1 stated that there have been occasions, when R1 will ask a question and S1 will reply, ‘I can’t talk with you right now’, and R1 feels that they can’t even ask S1 a question. R1 could not provide specifics of the occasions when they felt R1 was being ignored by S1. R1 added that S1 constantly yells at them in the lobby. When the LPA asked R1 if S1 has yelled to R1 in any other part of the facility (e.g., bedroom), R1 stated, “No, only in the lobby”. When asked what happened when S1 yelled, R1 said that they were just talking to someone else. The LPA asked R1 if there were other residents who have witnessed S1 yelling at R1 in the lobby? R1 provided one name, but added that that witness would not say anything, ‘because they like S1’. The LPA asked R1 how long the yelling has been going for? the R1 stated that they could not tell but added that it happens all the time. R1 added at the end of the interview that they love it here (facility), that everyone is very nice, and R1 likes the ED very much. The LPA interviewed five residents, and five out of five stated that they have not felt disrespect nor have been yelled at by S1. The LPA interviewed the administrator about the allegation, and the administrator stated that they have not witnessed S1 yell at anyone, and specifically in the lobby area. The LPA interviewed the ED, who stated that they were aware of the situation. The ED stated that R1 tends to get in the middle of other residents’ business while in the lobby, and consequently S1 might have brought it to R1’s attention. Additionally, the administrator and the ED explained that S1 could not yell due to a condition that prevents S1 from talking loudly. Continues on LIC 9099 C.. page 3 Page 3. The interview with the S1 revealed that on more than one occasion, R1 has used inappropriate language/comments out loud about another resident while the residents line up by the nurse’s station in the lobby. The residents line up to get their blood pressure and sugar levels checked by the nurse. Of the eight to nine residents, one resident tends to cut in the line, causing R1 to make remarks about the resident out loud. Per S1, ‘R1 is not even in the line, they are sitting by the window in the lobby when R2 cuts in line; S1 takes care of addressing the resident cutting in line by speaking with them directly. However, R1 still comments out loud, ‘They do that all the time’. The comments made by R1, prompted S1 to tell R1 (while in the lobby), to ‘Stop meddling’. Furthermore, S1 stated that indeed there have been times when R1 has questions, but S1 may be busy attending to other businesses/residents, consequently they might have said to R1 ‘I can’t speak with you now’. There are many occasions when R1 has requested assistance from S1 and S1 has provided the assistance, as part of their job. S1 denied being emotionally abusive or disrespectful to R1 or any other resident. The LPA spoke with a relative of R1, and stated that they were of the situation as explained by R1. However, the relative has not visited R1 in the facility, they do not live close by. They added that R1 sometimes has a tendency to exaggerate. Based on the information obtained through interviews and although the allegation may have happened, there is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation that staff are emotionally abusing residents, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview was conducted with the Executive Director. A copy of the report was issued.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87211(c)Type A

    87211(c) Reporting Requirements. Any suspected physical abuse that does not result in serious bodily injury... shall be reported to the local ombudsman, the licensing agency, and the local law enforcement agency within twenty-four (24) hours.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as facility staff did not fulfill reporting requirements to appropriate parties, including Mandated Reporter requirements by reporting suspected abuse, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87463(a)(3)Type B

    87463(a)(3) Reappraisals(a)The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate. The reappraisals shall document changes in the resident's physical, medical, mental, and social condition. Significant changes shall include but not be limited to: (3) Any illness, injury, trauma, or change in the health care needs of the resident that results in a…This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, R1’s Reappraisal was not updated when R1 began drinking alcohol, smoking marijuana and had a change of mental condition, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 3, 2024 inspection of RESIDENCES AT ROYAL BELLINGHAM, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of RESIDENCES AT ROYAL BELLINGHAM, THE on January 3, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to RESIDENCES AT ROYAL BELLINGHAM, THE on January 3, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.