Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

RESIDENCES AT ROYAL BELLINGHAM, THELicense 1976081292 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegations: “Due to staff neglect resident developed multiple pressure injuries while in care” and “Facility did not seek timely medical attention for resident with pressure injuries” It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) developed two (2) Stage II pressure injuries due to staff neglect and that facility staff failed to seek timely medical attention. Physician’s Report dated 05/22/2025 documented that R1 had coronary artery disease and was receiving hospice services at that time. R1 also had mild cognitive impairment but was able to follow instructions and communicate their needs. R1 had a history of skin breakdown, including an open skin impairment on the “butt and sacrum.” Resident Appraisal dated 11/24/2025 indicated R1 was non-ambulatory with a wheelchair and required assistance with transferring, repositioning, and incontinence care. Interviews with staff and the ED revealed no documented reports or observations of pressure injuries, and staff denied the allegations. Staff stated they provided incontinence care and repositioned R1 every two (2) hours; however, their statements were inconsistent regarding R1’s repositioning schedule and whether R1 was bedbound. Approximately three (3) months prior to the allegations, R1 was discharged from hospice services. While on hospice, R1 received wound care for a wound staff reported had “healed.” Staff further reported that R1 experienced recurring redness and a dry, scabbing blister on the right buttock. Staff stated they applied “cream” and “ointment” to the area during incontinence care. Staff #1 (S1) reported observing an intermittent “small wound” approximately the size of a quarter prior to the allegations but could not recall whether this was reported to Administrators or Med-Techs. Staff #2 (S2) also confirmed that a pressure injury appeared to be developing but stated that lotion was applied and it “went away.” According to the ED, staff are trained to report skin changes to Management, who then assesses the issue, notifies the resident’s physician and responsible party, and document the occurrence in the resident’s file. S1 stated they did not receive training on identifying pressure injuries. Staff #3 (S3) confirmed being notified of R1’s dry blister but could not recall the location of the blister or timing of the report. S3 stated that no follow up occurred because the blister was “dry.” S3 also reported that skin changes are not documented and that staff notifications are verbal only. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C R1 reported that staff do not respond promptly to requests for assistance and that they often wait a long time for help. R1 stated they remain in bed for “too long” and rely on staff for repositioning and transfers, which is sometimes delayed or does not occur. R1 reported being treated well overall and receiving frequent brief changes but could not provide specifics. R1 acknowledged having pressure injuries and stated that staff apply cream “most of the time.” A review of R1’s Service Log between 11/01/2025 to 01/06/2026 showed that “Incontinent Care” was provided between one (1) to four (4) times a day, with some days showing gaps of more than ten (10) hours between services. Mobility assistance was documented approximately once per day. On 01/06/2026, R1 was admitted to the hospital at 6:44PM with left-sided facial droop. R1 was transferred to a second hospital on 01/07/2026 at 12:44AM, where pressure ulcers were observed during the admission assessment. A wound consult completed on 01/08/2026 confirmed two (2) Stage II pressure injuries on the left and right buttocks. Based on interview and record review, R1 experienced skin changes that were not addressed in a timely manner, resulting in the development of Stage II pressure injuries. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegations are deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. An immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500 was assessed today (Refer to LIC 421M). The ED was informed that additional civil penalties may be assessed based on Health and Safety Code Section 1569.49. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations and/or the Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (Refer to 809-D). Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights and report was reviewed and provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87464(f)(1)Type A

    (f) basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c)This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section in R1 developed 2 Stage II pressure injuries which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87631(a)(3)Type A

    (a)Except as specified in Section 87611(a), the licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain a resident who has a healing wound under the following circumstances: (3) Residents with a stage one or two pressure injury must have the condition diagnosed by a physician or an appropriately skilled professional.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section in R1 developed 2 Stage II pressure injuries that were not treated which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 15, 2026 inspection of RESIDENCES AT ROYAL BELLINGHAM, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of RESIDENCES AT ROYAL BELLINGHAM, THE on April 15, 2026. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to RESIDENCES AT ROYAL BELLINGHAM, THE on April 15, 2026?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "(f) basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.