complaint·March 18, 2025

immediately. Neither residents sustained an injury during the conflict. This was the first time that R1 and R2 had an altercation. No previous incidents between the two in the past. According to the administrator, R1 has a history of confusion, but is not aggressive. R1 does have a history of making false accusations and doesn't adjust as well socially. R2 is active amongst the community, but has no history of being aggressive towards peers. R2 also does not have a history of confusion or being aggressive. Interviews with ten (10) of ten residents could not confirm the allegation. In addition to interviews, LPA was able to review surveillance of the incident that occurred at 8:15am, on 03/11/25. LPA observed both R1 and R2 in the dining room together, when the altercation between the two occurred. LPA observed and confirmed that it was R1 that struck R2, but staff was present, and did intervene between the two residents, redirecting both residents. Although there was an altercation between R1 and R2, that lead to R1 striking R2, there wasn't enough evidence to prove that staff did not prevent resident from hitting another resident in care. as there was staff supervision present to intervene and redirect both residents. Moreover, licensee did submit an Incident Report (IR) to the Licensing agency regarding the incident. Therefore, based on the information obtained the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.