Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

REDONDO BEACH ELDERLY HOMELicense 197608376
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 10/01/25, LPA retrieved a copy of R1’s Morphine Record (08/04/25), Physician’s Reports (R2 – R6), Updated Training Record (S1) and interviewed Witnesses #1 - #2. On 10/13/25, LPA received R1’s records from Home Care Visit in Providence Hospice LA County. On 10/16/25, LPA interviewed Witness #11. On 10/17/25, LPA interviewed Witness #5, #7, #9 and #10. On 10/30/25, LPA received R1’s death certificate. On 11/03/25, LPA interviewed Staff #9 - #10. Note: LPA left a message/voicemail to interview Witness #6, #8 (09/17/25, 09/29/25, 10/17/25). Regarding the allegation, “Staff did not inform responsible party of resident's change of condition,” it is being alleged that R1 collapsed on 07/29/25 and the responsible parties were not notified. Record review of Home Care Visit in Providence Hospice LA County (Encounter Notes) revealed on 07/29/25, R1 lost consciousness after dinner, per B&C caregiver. R1 was taken to his bed, however, R1’s health continued to decline and R1 became unresponsive and bedbound since 08/01/25. Record review of staff schedule (07/29/25) revealed that S7 worked from 3 PM - 12 AM, S3 worked from 6 AM - 6 PM, S8 worked from 11 AM - 8 PM, S1 worked from 7 AM - 4 PM, and S6 worked from 12 AM - 9 AM. Interview with Hospice Nurse (Witness 11) indicated W11 was unable to recall the name of the B&C caregiver but indicated that the staff was a woman (S1, S3, S6 - S7). Five out of five staff interviews (S1, S3 and S6-S8) indicated R1 did not collapse nor fall. Interview with the Administrator indicated that there were no reports of R1 collapsing. S7 indicated that R1 did not collapse but during dinner, S7 noticed R1 was getting tired so R1 was assisted to R1’s room. Four out of six responsible party/witness interviews (W4 – W7, W9 - W10) indicated they are notified of incidents and changes of resident’s condition. Regarding the allegation, “Staff did not inform responsible party of resident's change of condition,” based on record reviews and interviews, the Department found no evidence to support the allegation mentioned above. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, as a result, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted over the phone with Area Manager Irene Formentera and a copy of this report was provide to Staff.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 5, 2025 inspection of REDONDO BEACH ELDERLY HOME?

This was a complaint inspection of REDONDO BEACH ELDERLY HOME on November 5, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to REDONDO BEACH ELDERLY HOME on November 5, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.