Complaint·February 6, 2026

LPA also interviewed resident 1-2 (R1-R2) and attempted to interview residents 3-9 (R3-R9) during the visit. On 2/6/2026 At 8:45 AM, LPA was able to conduct an interview with S1. Investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff did not prevent a resident from eloping from the facility. LPA conducted interviews and 3 out of 5 staff members stated R1 did elope from the facility without staff knowledge. The interview with S1 stated R1 had eloped from the facility without staff’s knowledge and located about 8:00AM the same day. The interviews conducted with Staff 2-3 (S2-S3) stated they were not scheduled to work during the incident but heard about R1 eloping from the facility. Staff members 4-5 (S4-S5) also stated R1 did elope from the facility on January 16, 2026, at approximately 7:00 AM and was found approximately about 8:00AM the same day. LPA interviewed Resident 1 (R1), who stated they left the facility but were unable to provide specific details about the incident. Resident 2 (R2) stated they have not left the facility but expressed a desire to return to their home. LPA attempted to interview Residents 3- 9 (R3–R9); however, they were asleep during the visit and could not be interviewed. Upon arrival, LPA observed that the auditory alert device at the front entry was turned on and approximately about 10:40 AM it was turned off by S4 and later turned back on at approximately about 12:00 PM. Based on interviews conducted, observations and records reviewed the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC-9099D. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was provided to Area Manager- Irene Formentera at the conclusion of the visit with appeal rights.