Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Department of Social Services -Community Care Licensing Division (DSS/CCLD) Investigator Laura Garcia conducted the following: interviewed R-1’s authorized representative, obtained Coroner’s Report, obtained a copy of Glendale Police Department incident report, obtained medical records, interviewed Facility Executive Director, Interview Staff #1 (S-1) through Staff #6 (S-6) and interviewed R-1’s hospice agency. Allegation : Resident sustained serious fall resulting in death. Per Investigator Garcia’s interviews and documentation obtained “there was insufficient evidence to determine if there was neglect/lack of supervision on behalf of facility members which lead to the death” of R-1. Per Investigator Garcia’s investigation, the cause of death noted on R-1’s death certificate was not due to a fall. Per Investigator Garcia, R-1 passed away on 05/04/2021 while residing at another facility. Per documentation reviewed, R-1 was discharged/moved out from this facility on 03/24/2021. Interviews conducted and documentation obtained do not corroborate this allegation. Allegation: Resident sustained unexplained bruising while in care. Per Investigator Garcia’s interviews and documentation obtained, (S-6) “denied ever hurting” R-1 or “striking” R-1. Glendale Police Department conducted interviews and “was unable to determine if a crime had occurred”. Interviews revealed that R-1 was aggressive and was known to display self injurious behaviors. Hospice documented that R-1 also bumped self with furniture which may have contributed to unexplained bruising. Interviews revealed that R-1’s authorized representative was aware of R-1’s behaviors. Staff interviews revealed that staff had not witnessed any staff physically abusing R-1. Staff interviews revealed that they did not receive any concerns/complaints in regards to R-1. Interviews conducted and documentation obtained do not corroborate this allegation. Allegation: Resident lost significant amount of weight while in care. Hospice documentation indicate that R-1 preferred to sleep and skip meals due to the “grogginess” of the medications which was communicated to R-1’s authorized representative. Per S-4, staff document residents’ weight on a monthly basis. LPA obtained weight records for R-1 from December 2020 (Admission) through March 2021 (Discharge). Upon discharge/move out date (03/24/21), R-1 had a weight difference of (4) pounds. Per interviews conducted, staff and hospice agency were in constant contact with R-1’s authorized representative about R-1’s health and needs. Interviews conducted and documentation obtained do not corroborate this allegation. Refer to LIC 9099C for the continuation of this report. Allegation : Resident's care needs were not met while in care. It is alleged that this facility staff was not providing R-1 with care needs while in care. Based on reviewed documents and interviews conducted, the facility staff informed R-1’s authorized representative and hospice agency of R-1’s change in condition. The facility staff also submitted special incident reports for R-1 to Community Care Licensing. Interviews conducted and documentation obtained do not corroborate this allegation. Allegation: Facility denied access to Ombudsman. It is alleged that the facility denied access to Ombudsman. LPA attempted to have contact with Ombudsman and was unable to reach a representative. Per S-4, staff do not deny access to Ombudsman. Per S-4, Ombudsman staff come in and request a copy of the resident roster (proper identification is reviewed/confirmed) prior to releasing a copy of the resident roster. Per S-4 once this step is completed, Ombudsman visits the residents in their room privately. Per S-4, S-4 has not received any requests for resident records nor recalls any Ombudsman representative visiting R-1. Interview does not corroborate this allegation. Based on record review and interviews conducted the findings indicate, although the allegation(s) may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation(s) are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview conducted, appeal rights and a copy of this report was provided to Brenda Chacon.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 4, 2023 inspection of GLEN PARK AT GLENDALE - BOYNTON ST?

This was a complaint inspection of GLEN PARK AT GLENDALE - BOYNTON ST on May 4, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to GLEN PARK AT GLENDALE - BOYNTON ST on May 4, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.