Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up

GLEN PARK AT GLENDALE - BOYNTON STLicense 1976085051 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

At 11:00 a.m. on 03/20/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA met with staff and later the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. Today’s case management visit was conducted after review of the complaint #31-AS-20241023131909 revealed the facility did not apply for an exception for a resident with a worsening prohibited health condition. To investigate complaint #31-AS-20241023131909, LPA conducted an initial visit on 10/29/24 and interviewed staff and residents between 10:30 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., toured the facility inside and out at 10:45 a.m., and conducted a record review of pertinent records, including but not limited to staff and client rosters at 2:15 p.m. LPA conducted a subsequent visit on 11/06/24 and toured the facility at 1:30 p.m. and conducted a record review of pertinent records, including but not limited to wound care notes at 2:00 p.m. Today, LPA conducted a record review at 10:00 a.m. of additional wound care notes and hospice records of Resident #1 (R1) and toured the facility at 11:15 a.m. Interview with the administrator at 10:35 a.m. on 10/29/24 revealed no residents currently have prohibited health conditions. There is one (01) resident, R1, who has a Stage 1 pressure injury, which is a restricted but allowable condition in this facility. Record review today of R3’s hospice records and wound care notes from June 2024 to September 2024 revealed that R3 enrolled into hospice services for “other frontotemporal degeneration”. R3’s wound care notes showed they were visited by hospice nurses about twice a week and by wound care specialists about once a week between July 2024 and September 2024. R3 was diagnosed with a Stage 3 sacrococcygeal pressure injury on 06/26/24 and a stage 3 pressure injury on their left heel on 07/03/24. R3’s pressure injury on their heel healed over time and was fully healed by 09/11/24. R3’s sacrococcygeal pressure injury was smaller in size each week except from 08/07/24 to 08/14/24 when the wound increased from 1.9 centimeters (cm) long x .6 cm wide x .1 cm deep to 3.5 cm long x 1.1 cm wide x .5 cm deep. The wound had grown in size and was not healing during that period of time. A file review at 11:30 a.m. today of an incident report submitted the facility revealed that on 09/17/24, R3 was hospitalized due to needing a higher level of care from their Stage 3 pressure injury which measured approximately .75 inches long (about 1.9cm). Interview with the administrator today at 11:50 a.m. revealed R3’s hospice services expired that day. Therefore, R3 was eventually hospitalized with the prohibited health condition. Based on interviews and record reviews, when wound care specialists measured R3’s sacrococcygeal pressure injury on 08/14/24 to be larger than the previous week, the facility should have either sent R1 to a facility which could provide a higher level of care or applied for an exception to retain R1 at the facility and continue all services to support R1. The facility did not hospitalize R3 or apply for an exception, and therefore a deficiency is issued on the corresponding LIC809-D page. Due to disagreeing with today's findings, the licensee and administrator declined to sign this document. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.73(b)Type B

    §1569.73 Terminally ill residents... (b) At any time that… the facility... determines that the resident's condition has changed ... the facility may initiate procedures for a transfer.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by retaining Resident #1 (R1) with a worsening prohibited health condition and not applying for an exception which posed a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 20, 2025 inspection of GLEN PARK AT GLENDALE - BOYNTON ST?

This was a other inspection of GLEN PARK AT GLENDALE - BOYNTON ST on March 20, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to GLEN PARK AT GLENDALE - BOYNTON ST on March 20, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "§1569.73 Terminally ill residents... (b) At any time that… the facility... determines that the resident's condition has ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.