complaint·June 2, 2022

Five (5) out of six (6) residents could not corroborate the allegation. Resident interviews from R2 through R6 revealed that staff safeguarded residents’ belongings and residents did not have items missing from their rooms. Interview with R1 stated resident had belongings missing since moved in. Four (4) out of four (4) staff denied the allegation. Staff interviews revealed that facility would safeguard residents’ belongings. Staff said that residents’ belongings were mostly misplaced if they were reported missing. File review revealed R1 did not have the procession of the missing items upon admission to the facility. LPA visited resident#1 in resident’s room and observed the said missing items were in resident’s closet. In regard to allegation: “Resident’s medications are being mismanaged”, it was alleged that staff did not administer one of R1’s medication as prescribed three times a day in a timely basis. Five (5) out of six (6) residents could not corroborate the allegation. Resident interviews from R2 through R6 revealed that staff administer residents’ medication as prescribed. Interview with R1 stated resident did not get medication as prescribed. Four (4) out of four (4) staff denied the allegation. Staff interviews revealed staff did not mismanage resident’s medication. LPA reviewed R1’s medication record, it revealed that R1’s medication is PRN which is administered as needed, not on a routine basis of three times a day. The investigation did not reveal staff mismanaged resident’s medications. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted with Assistant Administrator. A hard copy of this report was provided.