Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(Continued from LIC9099) Allegation #1: Staff are sexually abusing residents and staff. Regarding the allegation, it was reported that Staff#1 (S1) has been sexually abusing residents. Interviews conducted by LPA Rios on 10/15/24, and 11/12/24 revealed eight (8) residents and five (5) staff that lived and worked in the facility since the initial visit all denied either being sexually abused or witnessing any staff sexually abuse residents. Interview obtained from Complaint Control 29-AS-20230406155619 with S1 revealed they deny ever abusing any residents in any form. Staff interviews revealed S1 has minimal to no contact with residents at this facility and they have never witnessed S1 alone with a resident. Furthermore seven (7) out of the ten (10) residents interviewed revealed all staff in general treat residents well, and residents did not voice any concerns of sexual abuse. Interview with one (1) resident had concerns regarding staff, but it did not involve sexual abuse and two (2) residents were asleep during visit. LPAs tours of the facility on 05/30/23, 10/15/24 and 11/12/24 did not observe and health or safety concerns or issues. Based on interviews, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that, staff are sexually abusing residents and staff, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation #2: Facility staff are not qualified. Regarding the allegation, it was reported that Staff#1 (S1) is not qualified to run and manage the facility. To investigate the allegation LPA conducted interviews with the ED and staff. According to the ED, S1 is part of the cooperation and has no contact with residents directly. When S1 visits the facility they meet with the administration to discuss and conduct building safety checks. S1 reports any concerns to the Administrator. According to the ED, S1 does not work in the capacity to "run and manage" the facility. The ED is responsible for the day to day operations of the facility. Furthermore, the there is also an administrator assistant at this facility. Review of the Administrator Certification for Susan Park is active and she has been the administrator since the initial visit. According to staff, S1 conducts quality assurance visits, for example issues with the physical building in regards to issues like workers compensation. Based on interviews and record review the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued to Assistant Administrator, Bryanna Luke .

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 12, 2024 inspection of GLEN PARK AT GLENDALE - MARIPOSA ST?

This was a complaint inspection of GLEN PARK AT GLENDALE - MARIPOSA ST on November 12, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to GLEN PARK AT GLENDALE - MARIPOSA ST on November 12, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.