Complaint·June 29, 2022

Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) also indicated that they did not receive notification regarding the incident involving R1. Therefore there was sufficient evidence to corroborate with the allegation. Based on LPA's observations and interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview held and a copy of this report was provided. 5 out of 5 residents interviewed denied the allegation. 2 out of the 5 residents interviewed indicated they were not aware of this incident. Residents interviewed indicated that they feel there is sufficient staff to provide adequate supervision and monitoring to meet their needs. Residents interviewed indicated they feel safe and comfortable at this facility. Therefore there was insufficient evidence to corroborate with the allegation. Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, residents, review of resident files and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided.