Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

VILLAGE AT SHERMAN OAKS, THELicense 197608694
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from 9099 Between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., LPA Balisi conducted a physical plant tour and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On 09/03/2021, from 12:45 p.m. to 1:30 p.m., LPA Balisi conducted a subsequent complaint visit to review and obtain copies of additional documents relevant to the investigation. Investigator Real conducted interviews with the Assisted Living Director on 06/15/2021; with R1’s private caregiver on 07/16/2021; with Hospice employees on 08/04/2021 and 08/13/2021; with facility employees on 08/17/2021 and 08/19/2021; with former facility employees on 09/07/2021, 09/10/2021, and 09/28/2021; and with residents on 09/07/2021. On 12/13/2021, Investigator Real conducted additional interviews with two (2) family members of R1. Investigator Real reviewed the facility progress notes for R1. The progress note dated 04/05/2021 at 7:28 a.m. indicated R1 had a skin tear on left hand. R1’s hospice agency was notified along with R1’s family member. The progress note dated 04/16/2021 at 10:45 a.m. indicated R1’s private caregiver reported to a facility staff #1 (S1) that R1 had a bloody lip. S1 checked R1’s lip and there was no trauma to the area. R1’s lips were dry and chapped with a bead sized amount of blood. S1 cleaned the area and applied lotion. Neither S1 nor the private caregiver noted any other areas of concern on R1’s face or head at that time. A short time later, R1’s private caregiver and a hospice employee showered R1 and observed a bump on R1’s forehead. The skin at the center of the bump was open and it appeared to be an abrasion. S1 reported changing R1 earlier and did not see any bumps on R1’s head Investigator Real reviewed Oakhurst Hospice agency records for R1. The hospice notes for 05/05/2021 indicated that the hospice nurse observed R1 had a skin tear on the back of left hand that had been bandaged. The notes for 04/16/2021 indicated R1 had a small abrasion on forehead as well on one on upper lip and the cause was unknown. There were no abuse or neglect concerns noted in the hospice records. Continued from 9099-C On the allegation: Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision – Facility employees failed to provide an appropriate level of supervision which resulted in Resident #1 (R1) sustaining a skin tear on hand, a scrape/bump on forehead and a small injury to lip. Investigator Real conducted interviews with R1’s private caregiver, hospice employees, facility employees, residents and family members. None of the persons interviewed reported knowing how R1’s injuries occurred, and none suspected any abuse or neglect. R1’s private caregiver discovered the injuries and denied harming or accidentally causing the injuries. R1’s private caregiver had no abuse or neglect concerns regarding the facility employees and suspected the injuries were accidental and may have occurred while transferring R1 or changing R1’s diapers. A hospice nurse who regularly saw R1 in the facility reported that R1 had very thin skin and was susceptible to skin tears. The hospice employees had no abuse or neglect concerns regarding the facility employees and felt R1 received good care in the facility. The facility residents had no abuse or neglect concerns and reported the facility employees treat them well. The facility employees denied the allegation, and none reported knowing how the injuries occurred. R1’s family members have not witnessed or observed any of the facility employees neglect R1. The injuries were discovered at different times, with the skin tear on R1’s hand observed eleven days prior to the discovery of the scrape on R1’s lip. The private caregiver brought a facility employee to check R1’s lip and neither of them saw any injury on R1’s forehead at that time. The forehead injury was not discovered until a little later in the morning while the private caregiver and a hospice employee were giving R1 a shower. Prior to the shower, the private caregiver and the hospice employee transferred R1 out of bed using a Hoyer lift and then moved R1 into the shower via a wheelchair. It seems more likely than not that the forehead injury occurred at some point when the private caregiver and the hospice employee transferred R1 out of bed with the Hoyer lift. The information and evidence obtained during the investigation did not sufficiently support the allegation, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Continued from 9099-C On the allegation: Physical Abuse – R1 was physically abused by an unknown suspect which resulted in a skin tear on hand, a scrape/bump on forehead and a small injury to lip. Investigator Real conducted interviews with R1’s private caregiver, hospice employees, facility employees, residents and family members. None of the persons interviewed reported knowing how R1’s injuries occurred. R1’s private caregiver denied harming R1 and had no abuse or neglect concerns regarding the facility employees. The hospice employees and residents had no abuse or neglect concerns. The facility employees denied the allegation. R1’s family members did not witness any of the facility employees harm or injure R1. R1’s hospice records were obtained, and no abuse or neglect concerns were noted in the records. The information and evidence obtained during the investigation did not sufficiently support the allegation, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview, copy of report given.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 13, 2022 inspection of VILLAGE AT SHERMAN OAKS, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of VILLAGE AT SHERMAN OAKS, THE on January 13, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to VILLAGE AT SHERMAN OAKS, THE on January 13, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.