Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

VILLAGE AT SHERMAN OAKS, THELicense 1976086941 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(PAGE 2) Report continued from LIC 9099... On the allegation Facility staff did not ensure Residents Responsible Parties (RRP) received written notice of rate increase, it is the concern of the Reporting Party (RP) that R1’s RRP received a bill dated 07/23/2025 with a $500 rent increase without proper notice. To investigate this complaint, LPA Byrne contacted R1's RRP on 08/22/2025 at 10:25 a.m., on 08/25/2025 starting at 10:28 a.m. LPA Mosley conducted a file review for Resident #1 (R1) starting at 10:50 a.m. conducted two (2) in-person interviews, with the Business Manager and at 11:00 a.m. with the ED, and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Interview with R1's RRP revealed that they were out of the country and got a bill via email with an invoice reflecting an increase of $500 however never received a notice. R1's RRP stated once they got back from vacation they went in person to ask why there was an increase in August and was told by the finance manager that it was a yearly increase. R1's RRP informed the finance manager that they never got a notice. Interview with Business Manager revealed that an official notice was sent on 06/13/2025 via mail reflecting the rate change to $9,255 effective 08/12/2025 giving a 90-day notice as stated in the admission agreement. It was later noted that there was a mistake and the date was auto populated with a 60 day vs 90 day notice. Interview with the ED revealed that the rent increase notice was sent on 06/13/2025 however there must have been a glitch as they adhere to the 90 day notice per regulation. LPA reviewed facility’s Admission Agreement. Per the admission agreement, under section PART B. 6 Fees, subsection d adjustments to fees: Generally we give sixty (60) days' written notice of any change in the Monthly fee... During today’s visit, LPA clarified that, pursuant to updated Health and Safety regulation effective January 2025, on and after January 1, 2025, a licensee must provide no less than 90 days written notice for rate increases. The written notice must include the amount of the increase, the reason or reasons for the increase, and a description of the additional costs, except for an increase in the rate due to a change in the level of care of the resident (PIN 24-08-ASC page 4-5). LPA requested a revised version of facility’s admission agreement under PART B. 6 Fees, subsection d adjustments to fees: to reflect new changes. It was noted that a 60 day notice was given however a 90 notice is required per regulation. Based on information gathered during the course of the investigation, there is sufficient evidence to determine that “Facility staff did not ensure residents responsible parties received written notice of rate increase” is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations and/or CA Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D.) Administrator was informed that failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.655Type B

    1569.655 (a) If a licensee of a residential care facility for the elderly increases the rates of fees for residents...the licensee shall provide no less than 90 days' prior written notice...the amount of the increase...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when they issued a general rate increase with less than 90 days’ notice, which posed a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 25, 2025 inspection of VILLAGE AT SHERMAN OAKS, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of VILLAGE AT SHERMAN OAKS, THE on August 25, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to VILLAGE AT SHERMAN OAKS, THE on August 25, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "1569.655 (a) If a licensee of a residential care facility for the elderly increases the rates of fees for residents...th..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.