Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

MEADOWBROOK AT AGOURA HILLSLicense 197608878
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(Report Continued from LIC 9099...) The allegations of ‘Questionable Death’ and ‘Insufficient Staffing’ alleges when Resident #1 (R1) passed away they were already stiff and cold when they were found. Furthermore, it is alleged that staff did not assist R1 properly when they were needing assistance the day prior to R1’s death. It is also alleged that R1 was not checked during the night prior to death, due to only one staff member working on the night shift. On 01/13/2022, the Administrator submitted a Death Report (LIC 624) for R1 stating on 01/11/2022 at approximately 9:00 a.m., Staff #1 (S1) observed R1 to be unresponsive in their bed. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was performed and 9-1-1 was contacted. R1 was last seen responsive around 6:00 a.m. The Death Certificate for R1 was obtained. The hour of death noted was 7:40 a.m. The immediate cause of death listed was Cardiopulmonary Arrest, mins. The underlying causes of death were listed as Chronic Hypoxic failure, months, Acute on Chronic Heart Failure, years, and Pulmonary Emphysema, years. The Department requested a copy of R1’s autopsy report but one was not available for review. Facility record review revealed R1 had a diagnosis of Congestive Heart Failure, COPD, and Mild Cognitive Impairment. R1’s most recent needs and service plan dated 10/12/2021, indicated R1 was independent with all aspects of R1’s oxygen use and was primarily independent except for assistance with medications. Interviews conducted revealed the day before R1’s passing on 01/10/2022, R1 only drank orange juice for breakfast which was normal and only had lunch. Additionally, R1 was observed to be in bed during meal service delivery approximately around 12:00 p.m. Staff interviews also reflected that R1 stated they “tired and not feeling well” however, this was nothing unusual from R1’s day to day behavior. Staff also reported R1 appeared to be in pain however, R1 was breathing normal and was not observed to be struggling with breathing. Additionally, it was revealed R1 used oxygen every day and night. Moreover, medication records reviewed revealed R1 received their scheduled dose of Oxycodone/Acetaminophen at 8:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. on 01/10/2022. (Report Continued from LIC 9099...) (Report Continued from LIC 9099C...) During the interview with S1, they could not recall the time they went into R1’s room to give them their medications but said they start their day at 6:00 a.m. and it was before breakfast. S1 stated when they entered the room, they found R1 in bed, unconscious with no vitals. S1 stated they called 9-1-1 and were asked to perform CPR which they did until paramedics arrived. S1 stated R1 was cold and purple when they found R1. S1 stated R1 used oxygen but could not recall if it was on or not when they found R1. S1 stated R1 had a decline in health prior to death but R1 had no sudden medical changes. R1 was pronounced deceased by paramedics. Additional interviews with staff revealed, approximately between 6:00 a.m. and 7:30 a.m. they were advised that S1 needed assistance with R1. When they arrived S1 was on the phone with paramedics and was being directed to perform CPR. Staff stated they did not observe any obvious trauma to R1 but could tell by the color of their skin that they had passed away. The overnight staff interview revealed R1 was last check between 4:00 a.m. and 4:30 a.m. and was observed to be breathing and sleeping in their bed. During the interview the overnight staff stated they check on all the residents at night. Interviews and email correspondences with Executive Director, Joey Alvarado revealed although R1 was not receiving hospice care, R1 was declining in health leading up to their death, including eating less and having more pain. The Administrator stated R1 was checked at 6:00 a.m. as part of the morning routine and was observed to be waking up. When staff went into R1’s room for the morning medication pass they observed R1 to be in bed unresponsive and 9-1-1 was called. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to support that R1’s death was a result of staff neglect. Additionally, there is also insufficient evidence to support the allegation of facility was not staffed sufficiently resulting in R1 not being checked during the night shift. Therefore, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. (Report Continued on LIC 9099C...) (Report Continued from LIC 9099C...) The allegation of ‘Medications are not being administered as prescribed’ allege Resident #2’s (R2) medication Warfarin is not being administered to R2 correctly. The reporting party stated one of the errors was documented in R2’s progress notes. During the interview with R2 on 02/15/2022, R2 reported no issues or concerns with medications or not receiving their medications correctly. On 02/15/2022, LPA Lopez reviewed medications and records for R2. Record review revealed R2’s Warfarin dosing is contingent on laboratory results and doctor’s orders. During the interview with medication technician staff, they stated they were not aware of any issues with R2 getting the correct dose of Warfarin. Staff stated the issue they have been having is the outside company who sends the facility the medication administration records (MAR) is not updating the MAR with the correct dose when it changes but stated the resident is getting the correct dose. The LPA reviewed the progress notes for R2 and did not see any documented medication errors written by staff. The LPA also reviewed medications and medication records for R2 on 02/15/2022 and did not observe any medication errors. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation of Medications are not being administered as prescribed occurred. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet residents’ needs.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as interviews revealed there are times when only two caregivers are on duty in the memory care with 28 residents which poses a potential health and safety risk for residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 22, 2023 inspection of MEADOWBROOK AT AGOURA HILLS?

This was a complaint inspection of MEADOWBROOK AT AGOURA HILLS on December 22, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MEADOWBROOK AT AGOURA HILLS on December 22, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.