Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ROYALTY ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 1976090012 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Therefore, LPA does not have sufficient evidence to prove the allegation “Financial Abuse”, and the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation # 2: Staff did not safeguard residents’ belongings: On September 10, 2021 and October 11, 2021, from 11am to 4pm, at various times, LPA conducted interviews with the complainant, staff, and residents at the facility. LPA also reviewed documents pertaining to the complaint. It was alleged, that when staff relocated R1 to another facility, R1’s personal belongings, such as clothing and electronic tablet was missing. On September 10, 2021, during the initial visit of the investigation, LPA interviewed R1, and observed the electronic tablet, that was alleged to be missing. According to R1, when R1 relocated back to the original placement, it was accidentally left at the previous relocation, but was given back to R1. LPA also observed clothing in R1’s clothing. LPA asked R1, if any clothing was left behind, and R1 stated, “no”, all the belongings in the closet were counted for. Although, it was alleged, “Staff did not safeguard residents’ belongings”, LPA did not have enough evidence to prove the allegation, therefore it is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation # 2: Resident's healthcare provider was not notified of change in facility. Allegation # 1: Resident was involuntarily transferred to another facility. On September 10, 2021 and October 11, 2021, from 11am to 4pm, at various times, LPA conducted interviews with the complainant, staff, and residents at the facility. LPA also reviewed documents pertaining to the complaint. R1 participates in PACE (Program of All Inclusive Care for the Elderly). They provide services for R1, such as health care and insurance coverage, as well as services provided by doctors and nurses. Information reviewed, determined that when R1 was transferred to the facility in Granada Hills, the facility did not notify PACE, and that facility was out of there service area, and R1’s services were in jeopardy of being discontinued. The facility was to notify PACE of any changes or information pertaining to the client. Therefore, the allegation “Resident's healthcare provider was not notified of change in facility, is SUBSTANTIATED . This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1Type B

    Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities...shall have all of the following personal rights: (8) To have their representatives regularly informed by the licensee of activities related to care or services, including ongoing evaluations, as appropriate to their needs. This requirement was not met, evidenced by: Facility relocated R1 without notifying R1's represetnatives. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87202(a)Type A

    All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance approved by the city, county, or city and county fire department, or district providing fire protection services, or the State Fire Marshal. Prior to accepting or retaining any of the following types of persons...the applicant or licensee shall notify the licensing agency..This requirement was not met, evidenced by, LPA observed (13) residents at the facility with only having a capacity for (10). This is an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87305(a)Type A

    Alterations to Existing Building or New Facilities (a) Prior to construction or alterations, all facilities shall obtain a building permit. This requirement was not met, evidenced by: LPA observed the facility had been altered and the facility did not provide the building permits or new facility sketch to LPA. This is an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87224(a)Type B

    Eviction Procedures. The licensee may, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the resident, evict the resident for nonpayment of the rate for basic services...failure to comply with the general policies of the facility development of a need not previously identified, and/or a change of use of the facility. This requirement was not met, evidenced by: through interviews R1 was relocated to another facility, and staff did not follow proper procedures. This poses a a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 28, 2022 inspection of ROYALTY ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of ROYALTY ASSISTED LIVING on May 28, 2022. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to ROYALTY ASSISTED LIVING on May 28, 2022?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities...shall have all of the..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.