complaint·July 21, 2021

(5) of (5) staff interviewed denied the allegation. (5) of (6) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Review of documents show that R1 received medications scheduled at 8am 12pm 5pm and 8pm on 7/16/21. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed there is not enough evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore this allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation "Staff did not assist resident with their toileting needs in a timely manner" it was alleged that staff took more than an hour to assist R1 with their toileting needs on 7/16/21. (5) of (5) staff interviewed denied the allegation. (5) of (6) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. LPA observed facility caregiver staff assisting R1 with their toileting needs between 11:30am-12:pm. R1 could not provide LPA with more information on times that staff would have taken long to assist but did state staff arrive to assist multiple times throughout the day. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed there is not enough evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore this allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation "Staff did not assist resident with their oxygen administration in a timely manner" it was alleged that staff did not assist R1 with their oxygen administration in a timely manner on 7/16/21. (5) of (5) staff interviewed denied the allegation. (5) of (6) residents interviewed denied the allegation. Review of R1's file show that R1 requires oxygen management. R1 stated to LPA that staff assist with the oxygen management daily. Staff interviews show that staff will check on R1 multiple times throughout the day as they are aware of R1's needs. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed there is not enough evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore this allegation is unsubstantiated. No Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22. An exit Interview was conducted with Executive Director Carlos Lara and a hardcopy was provided via email for signature. Signatures on hardcopy.