Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

GLEN TERRA ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 197609005
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

In regards to the allegation "Resident sustained multiple injuries while in care" it was alleged that R1 sustained multiple injuries in care and hospitalized due to lack of supervision. (5) of (5) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (7) of (7) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. It is alleged that R1 fell and broke their teeth on once occasion and then broke their shoulder because of a fall on another occasion. File review shows documentation of unwitnessed fall regarding R1 that resulted in R1 going to the hospital for a cut on their lip. Interview stated that staff were conducting a room check on 9/2/21 for R1 and noticed R1 had a cut on their lip. Due to it being an unwitnessed injury, staff called 911 to have R1 go to the hospital. There is no documentation or interviews from staff and residents stating that R1 broke their teeth in the facility. File review also shows documentation of a fall R1 had on 9/12/21 at approximately 1:45am near the facility elevator which resulted in a possible shoulder injury. According to interviews, R1 got out of bed in the middle of the night and went down the elevator. Upon stepping out the elevator R1 lost balance and fell. Staff interviews show that R1 was immediately assisted by staff. Interviews show that R1 liked to walk around the facility on their own and when they pleased. R1 did not require one on one supervision per review of their file. Staff interviews also stated that R1 was sent to the hospital that night but did not return to the facility as family relocated them. There are no further documents on file regarding R1's fall on 9/12/21. LPA was not provided any further documentation regarding the hospital visit or status of R1. Based on files reviewed, observations, and interviews conducted, there was not enough supportive evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. In regards to the allegation of "Areas of potential hazard to residents with poor eyesight were not kept inaccessible to residents." it was alleged that the facility did not close off a construction zone causing R1 to fall. (5) of (5) Staff denied the allegation. (7) of (7) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews state there was a night where the facility hired an individual to fix a small section of tile in the hallway near the elevator. The work was being done between 12am-4am as to not bother residents in care or interfere with any daily activities. Signage was put upon the walls as well as caution cones places to block the area. Staff had view of the area as needed to make sure residents kept their distance. Interviews show that R1 came down the elevator from their room around this time and ignored signs and directions from staff present to not walk towards that specific area where the floor was being repaired. Based on files reviewed, observations, and interviews conducted, there was not enough supportive evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87506(e)Type B

    87506 Resident Records.(e) Original records or photographic reproductions shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years following termination of service to the resident.This was not met as evidenced by: R1 was discharged on 10/25/18 and file for R1 was requested in April and May of 2021 but staff could not provide the file. This shows a potential health and safety risk for residents in care and supervision.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 27, 2023 inspection of GLEN TERRA ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of GLEN TERRA ASSISTED LIVING on July 27, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to GLEN TERRA ASSISTED LIVING on July 27, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.