Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

STRAWBERRY COTTAGELicense 197609011
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Records revealed Mirtazapine 45 mg has been provided to R1 in the morning at approximately 8:00 a.m. even though medication label reads “evening”. According to Ricky De Sahagun administrator designee on 01/12/24 he gave medication at a different time because R1 had requested multiple times to give them the medication in the morning, Ricky complied so as not to upset R1. LPA interview with Eugenia (Gina) Galindo who signed the report on 01/12/24 revealed they followed the medication label and provided medication to R1 as directed although R1 was upset about it. LPA review of MAR for days in question revealed R1 was provided medication Mirtazapine in the morning. Based on medication records, interviews and observation although medication was not provided on directed time, there is not enough evidence, the wrong dosage was given to R1. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation #2: Staff not maintaining a comfortable room temperature for resident. It is alleged the temperature in resident’s #1 (R1’s) bedroom is uncomfortable at 68 degrees Fahrenheit. To investigate the allegation LPA observed the thermostat in the house on 01/12/24, the temperature read 73 degrees Fahrenheit. On today’s visit the thermostat read 71 degrees Fahrenheit. On 01/12/24 LPA interviewed three (3) out of six (6) residents. Interview with R1 revealed they felt their room was cold and the licensee would direct staff to turn off the heater, however the temperature was fine during interview. During the interview LPA observed R1 wearing a shirt without sleeves. Interview with two (2) residents able to communicate with LPA revealed the temperature in their room and in the facility feels comfortable and may get warm. Furthermore, resident #2 (R2) stated they turn on their ceiling fan and close the vents when it becomes too warm. They do not mind the temperature because they know R1 feels cold. Interviews with three (3) staff denied the allegation. According to Ricky he believes the resident’s medication may be the reason the R1 may feel cold at times. Based on the temperature on the thermostat, interviews with staff and residents, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation #3: Staff does not provide resident grab bars for safe showering. It is alleged resident #1 (R1) lost their balance and fell getting into the shower due to no grab bars to hold onto. To investigate the allegation LPA reviewed previous complaint control #31-AS-20230908152350. Facility had a grab bar and added a second grab bar entering the shower due to previous allegation in complaint. According to the licensee they got R1’s feedback on placement of grab bar added. Based on observation this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation #4: Call button not accessible to resident. It is alleged resident #1 (R1) had requested a call button be installed in the bathroom for assistance. To investigate the allegation LPA reviewed facility requirements for a capacity of 6. According to staff they check on residents routinely depending on needs and services and as needed. For residents requiring further assistance they have been provided pendants they can wear or keep at reach to call for assistance. Resident #1 (R1) has a pendant they can take with them through out the facility. On 01/12/24 LPA tested R1's pendant and the receiver made a load sound heard though out the facility. Based on the information provided through interviews and observations made this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANITATED at this time. Due to time constraints LPA was unable to address issues observed during physical plant tour. LPA informed administrator an unannounced case management visit will be made to address issues and concerns observed. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 12, 2024 inspection of STRAWBERRY COTTAGE?

This was a complaint inspection of STRAWBERRY COTTAGE on February 12, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to STRAWBERRY COTTAGE on February 12, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.