Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

MELROSE VILLASLicense 1976090762 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaQueena Lacy arrived at the faxcility on 8/5/2022 at 10:41am to conduct an unannounced case management visit. LPA meet with staff Alexcis Peralta and explained the purpose for this visit. A physical plant tour was conducted at 10:56am to ensure no immediate health and safety issues were present. No immediate health and safety issues were noted. The facility submitted a Serious Injury Report dated 7/29/2022 regarding resident #1 (R1) not in his room or located on the facility property. LPA requested documents relevant to the investigation at 11:26am. To investigate this incident, LPA Lacy interviewed staff #1 (S1) at 11:32am which revealed that staff conducted rounds at 10:30am and R1 was present at the facility. At approximately 12:00am staff conducted rounds and R1 was not present in the room, staff began to check the facility grounds and observed the exit gate on the left side of the building open and the cords connected to the egress gate was disconnect and pulled from the gate. Law enforcement was contacted and a report (7A21-W2) was completed. During the investigation LPA observed a ring camera located on the fence facing the exit gate, per S1, the ring camera was being charged at the time R1 exited the facility. Staff was not sure who and how the exit was monitored while the camera was charging. LPA tested the egress gate to find that the alarm was operational and functional at the time of the visit. Upon document review it was noted that R1 has Dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted. LPA interviewed Administrator at 12:21pm, who explained about their future plans to have better monitoring system for Dementia Resident. However, staff and Administrator were able to explain what actions they are taking to ensure health and safety of dementia residents. Based on interviews, inspection, observation and record review, It was concluded that. Continued on LIC809C The facility staff failed to provide required care and supervision to Dementia resident. Facility did not ensure that the monitoring system on all exit doors are functioning and being monitored properly. Exit interview was conducted with the S1, who was informed that since December 2021 they have at least 2 incidents in which due to neglect in care and supervision, dementia residents were able to leave the facility unassisted. On addition LPA Lacy informed S1 that AWOL of Dementia resident is posing an immediate health and safety hazard to the resident. Therefore, immediate Civil Penalty of $500.00 will be assessed at the time of this visit. No other immediate health and safety hazard is noted during this visit. Exit interview was completed, appeal rights were discussed and a copy of report was issued.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87464(d)Type A

    Acceptance obligations tied to pre-admission appraisal needs

    87464 Basic Services (d)A facility need not accept a particular resident for care. However, if a facility chooses to accept a particular resident for care, the facility shall be responsible for meeting the resident's needs as identified in the pre-admission appraisal…This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and observation of R1s physician report and pre appraisal, the facility failed to met R1 needs. This poses an immediate health and saftey to residents in care.

  • 87705(j)(k)(8)Type A

    87705 Care of Persons with Dementia.(j) The licensee shall have an auditory device or other staff...(k) The following initial and continuing requirements must be met...(8) Delayed egress devices shall not substitute for trained staff...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews with (S1), the facility failed to ensure that R1 did not leave the facility unassisted. This poses an immediate health and saftey risk to residents in care.

  • Maintain cleanliness and prevent incontinence odors

    87625Managed Incontinence(d)In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions...(3) Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence.This requirement is not met as evidenced by Based on LPA interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure that the facility is free from odors of incontinence.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 5, 2022 inspection of MELROSE VILLAS?

This was an other inspection of MELROSE VILLAS on August 5, 2022. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to MELROSE VILLAS on August 5, 2022?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87464 Basic Services (d)A facility need not accept a particular resident for care. However, if a facility chooses to ac..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.