Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

HOLLYWOOD HILLS SENIOR LIVINGLicense 1976091031 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Staff did not prevent a resident from eloping while in care - The Reporting Party (RP) alleges that on 1/11/25, approx. time of 7:49 pm, Resident#1 (R1) was identified as wandering around the Griffith Park area unattended. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted a records review, which revealed the following: Physician's report lists R1 as having a diagnosis of dementia. Incident reports show that, on Saturday, 1/11/25, R1 was last seen at the facility around 5:30 pm. Incident report states that R1 was later found wondering around the Griffith Park area by Los Angeles Police Department Officers who then transport R1 to Kaiser Hospital-Los Angeles for medical evaluation . Records review also revealed that, the following week, a subsequent elopement incident involving R1 occurred on Friday, 1/17/25. On both occasions, R1 was returned to the facility, and responsible family member (F1) was notified. Both incident reports state that R1 did not sustain any injuries, nor discomfort during these elopement events. LPA conducted interviews with staff which revealed the following: Staff-Resident Services Director, (S1) and Staff-Memory Care Director, (S2) both confirm that R1 eloped from the facility unsupervised, stating that R1 eluded facility's supervision. LPA interviewed R1's responsible family member (F1) which revealed the following: F1 states that the facility's community is good, and that staff workers "do a good job" of caring for R1. F1 confirms that facility staff provided them immediate notice when R1 eloped from the facility. Upon R1's return to the facility, F1 states the Administrator informed them that staff would be re-trained regarding resident supervision. Based on LPA records review, and interviews, the allegation that resident wandered away due to lack of supervision, is deemed Substantiated . Exit interview, copy of report, appeal rights, and citation provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87464(f)(c)Type B

    87464(f)(c)- "Care and supervision" means facility assumes responsibility for...assistance with activities of daily living without which the resident’s...safety, or welfare would be endangered. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Staff interviews and record review by LPA finds R1, a resident diagnosed as having dementia, and documented instances of wandering from the faciltiy, was able to elope from the facility unsupervised. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 18, 2025 inspection of HOLLYWOOD HILLS SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of HOLLYWOOD HILLS SENIOR LIVING on February 18, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to HOLLYWOOD HILLS SENIOR LIVING on February 18, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87464(f)(c)- "Care and supervision" means facility assumes responsibility for...assistance with activities of daily livi..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.