Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Interviews and records review revealed that the former staff in question was written up for various reasons but was not fired from the community due to mismanaging medication. Whereas additional interviews revealed that there was speculation surrounding the firing of a former staff member, sufficient evidence could not be obtained to validate such claims. The LPA conducted a medication audit with the assistance of the Director of Health Care Services at 3:23 p.m. The medication audit did not reveal any discrepancies or medication errors. Based on the investigation, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that staff mismanaged medication. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff failed to follow reporting requirements It was alleged that unusual incidents involvement the mismanagement of medication was not appropriately reported to the Department. Interviews and records review surrounding the allegations revealed insufficient evidence regarding the claim that staff mismanaged medication. Records review revealed that on several prior occasions, the community has submitted Unusual Incident Reports pertaining to medication errors. As such, there was no indication that the community failed to report a medication error and staff understand the requirements as it pertains to reporting. Based on the investigation, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the staff failed to follow reporting requirements. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87615(a)(1)Type A

    87615(a)(1) Prohibited Health Conditions. Persons who require health services for or have a health condition including, but not limited to, those specified below shall not be admitted or retained … (1) Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as R1 was retained in the facility with a stage III pressure injury, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 13, 2021 inspection of SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - CALABASAS?

This was a complaint inspection of SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - CALABASAS on September 13, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - CALABASAS on September 13, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.