Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley Smith conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the above facility. The LPA met with Executive Director Taylor Giunto and explained the reason for the visit. On 01/31/2019, the Department issued findings of Substantiated for the above allegation. The licensee was cited for violating California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, 87464(f)(1) Basic Services, in which “Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2.” An immediate civil penalty of $500 was also issued. An appeal was issued by the licensee, and the deficiency was dismissed. After further review, the Department has determined that the allegation, “Facility staff failed to provide proper care and supervision to Resident #1 (R1) which resulted in R1’s death” will be changed from Substantiated to Unsubstantiated. The $500 penalty will be dismissed. Although the Department is no longer substantiating the above allegation, the Department found that facility staff failed to provide proper care and supervision to Resident #1 (R1), which resulted in serious bodily injury and will be addressed in a Case Management visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.2(a)(4)Type A

    87468.2(a)(4) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities. Residents shall have all of the following...: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the investigation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as staff failed to provide proper care to R1 after administering insulin, resulting in R1 becoming hospitalized, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 29, 2021 inspection of SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - CALABASAS?

This was a complaint inspection of SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - CALABASAS on November 29, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - CALABASAS on November 29, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.