Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

IVY PARK AT BURBANKLicense 1976093621 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Staff is not able to meet resident's needs due to inadequate staffing. In regards to the allegation it is alleged that over the past 30 to 40 days there is not enough staffing at the facility to assist residents. Interview with the Executive Director revealed caregiver assistance is dependent on the level of care a resident may need or requires. Caregivers are provided assignment sheets with residents names to provide assistance to. Assistance with activities of daily living is dependent on what level of care the resident was assessed for. Caregivers are still required to respond to call button alerts from residents not on assignment sheet. Review of two (2) assignment sheets for the assisted living unit provided revealed 31-36 names with residents requiring varying degrees of assistance with toileting, transfer, bathing, dressing, grooming , escorting or status checks. For the assisted living unit there are three (3) shifts with three (3) to four (4) caregivers and one (1) to two (2) med-techs per shift with exception to the overnight shift. Interviews with staff and residents revealed on Wednesday, July 17, 2024 at 6 a.m. the Wellness Nurse at the time received a call from a med-tech informing her the only two (2) caregivers on site for the assisted living unit of the facility were threatening to walk out if they did not have a third caregiver on site. Both caregivers, Staff #1 (S1) and staff #2 (S2) confirmed in interviews they had been working with only two staff on most days for about two weeks and had gone from four caregivers to three caregivers prior to the two weeks. Interview with Health Services Director corroborates on the day at 6 a.m. staff threatened to walk out and were not performing their usual duties if a third caregiver did not arrive. Staff walked out at approximately 6:45 a.m. - 7 a.m. without having provided care to residents in the assisted living unit. Health Services Director, states the Wellness Nurse at the time called a caregiver from the Memory Care unit to cover until more staff arrived. LPA was able to confirm with memory care staff they received a call from the Wellness Director at 6:55 a.m. to assist. Three other staff arrived and were able to provide assistance to residents some time around 7:30 a.m. Interviews with five (5) out of the eight (8) residents interviewed revealed they have waited over 30 mins to receive assistance with four (4) of those residents citing the specific incident that occurred on Wednesday as one of the days they waited over 30 minutes. One (1) out of the eight (8) residents indicated that they have only heard from other residents concerns about response time. Seven (7) out of eight (8) residents interviewed are satisfied with the care being provided only citing the wait time to receive the assistance as a concern. Interviews indicate Wednesday was an Isolated incident, however, interviews indicate staffing has been a concern prior to the incident. Therefore the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Exit Interview conducted. Deficiencies cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Appeal Rights explained and provided. Copy of report provided Executive Director via email.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    (a)Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers... In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care as required in Section 87608, Postural Supports....This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews conducted, residents and staff revealed, residents have waited an unreasonable amount of time to receive assistance citing the number of staff on shift to provide care, which posed an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 23, 2024 inspection of IVY PARK AT BURBANK?

This was a complaint inspection of IVY PARK AT BURBANK on July 23, 2024. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to IVY PARK AT BURBANK on July 23, 2024?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "(a)Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers... In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, suffici..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.