Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

IVY PARK AT BURBANKLicense 197609362
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Lastly, LPA obtained copy of a Police Report on 12/31/2024. Allegation: Staff does not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident engaging in physical altercations with other residents. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was struck by Resident #2 (R2) in the dining room. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted an interview with the Executive Director (ED) and was informed that ED was not aware of the incident until Health Services Director (HSD) received a phone call from R1's family member. Interview with the HSD revealed that on 12/05/24, HSD was scheduled to work and did not witness R2 strike R1. Interview with HSD revealed that R1 did not inform any staff members about the incident nor did R1 complain about any head injury to the facility staff. Interview with four (4) staff members corroborated the statement provided by the HSD, and all four (4) staff informed LPA that they have not witnessed R2 engaging in physical altercations with R1. During the interview with the witness (R3), LPA was informed that he/she was sitting by R1 and observed R2 approached their table but did not witness R2 engaging in physical altercation. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with ten (10) residents and nine (9) out of ten (10) residents interviewed denied the above allegation. Lastly, a review of the Police Report revealed that an investigating officer inspected R1's head and did not observe any redness, swelling or injuries. Therefore, based on interviews, documentation received and record reviews this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention to resident. It was alleged that R2 struck R1 and no medical attention was provided by the facility staff. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted an interview with R1 and was informed that he/she was sitting in a dining room and around 1:00pm, R2 approached R1 from the back and hit R1 in the head with an unknown object. LPA was also informed that R1 did not inform any of the staff members, instead R1 went to R1's room and took a nap. Sometime around 4:00pm, R1 contacted the family member to inform about the incident. During the interview with HSD, LPA was informed that once the staff is aware of any incidents, it's immediately brought to her attention and if medical attention is required staff will follow the policy, Continue on LIC9099-C so that immediate assistance can be provided and an Incident Report can be completed within two (2) hours. LPA was also informed that since R1 did not inform anyone and no staff witnessed any incidents, no one was aware of any medical attention being required for R1. Interview with nine (9) out of ten (10) residents confirmed that the facility staff always provide medical attention as required. Therefore, based on interviews, record reviews and information gathered, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff does not provide a safe environment to residents. To investigated this allegation, LPA conducted an interview with the Executive Director (ED), Resident Care Coordinator (RCC) and Health Services Director (HSD) and was informed that prior to employment, all staff are provided with initial training on basic services and care and supervision to be able to provide a safe environment to residents. LPA conducted an interview with four (4) staff members who indicated they made sure that all residents are safe and comfortable. In addition, interview with nine (9) out of ten (10) residents expressed no concerns regarding this allegation. Residents revealed that they are happy with the facility and staff. Therefore, based on interviews and record reviews, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff do not notify responsible parties of incidents. It was alleged that R1's responsible party was not informed of an incident that occurred on 12/05/24. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted an interview with the Executive Director (ED), Resident Care Coordinator (RCC) and Health Services Director (HSD) and was informed that once there is an incident, the staff immediately notifies the upper management who then contact the family/responsible party/conservator. Interviews with ED, RCC and HSD revealed that the facility staff was not aware of the incident with R1, thus there was no reason for them to contact the responsible party. Based on interviews, and information gathered, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    Facility personnel, shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not `met as evidenced by: Based on LPA’s observations, review of facility files and information provided during interviews it was determined that the facility did not provide a sufficient number of staff to meet the needs of residents in care including but not limited to incontinent care, resulting in the risk to the health and safety of residents in care.

  • 87468(a)(1)Type A

    (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the investigation conducted by the Investigative Branch, substantiating sexual assault perpetrated by staff #1 (S1) on Resident #1 (R1) which posed an immediate health and safety risk or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 19, 2025 inspection of IVY PARK AT BURBANK?

This was a complaint inspection of IVY PARK AT BURBANK on February 19, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to IVY PARK AT BURBANK on February 19, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.