Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

WOODLAKE LOVING CARE LLCLicense 1976094952 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 12/8/25, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Perchui Milena Khurshudyan and Tihesha Smith, conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to this facility. Upon arrival LPAs met with Shakila Ardakani Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of today’s visit is to evaluate R1’s health condition, care plan, and the facility’s improper assessment practices related to R1’s return from the hospital. At approximately 10:50am, LPAs conducted a brief physical plant tour to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected. No health and safety hazards noted during the visit. On 10/17/25, LPA Khurshudyan received an Incident Report (IR) regarding R1, who developed wound on the right toe and per home health nurse evaluation R1 required antibiotic. On 10/23/25, LPA received another Incident Report regarding R1 being transferred to hospital due to wound infection on the toe. LPA contacted the Administrator for additional information regarding R1’s health condition. During phone conversation with the Administrator, LPA requested R1’s home health nurse visit notes, medical evaluation reports, hospital records, and informed the Administrator that to continue providing care under home health agency in the facility, the department will need an Exception Letter with care plan details before discharging R1 back to the facility with higher than stage 2 pressure ulcer. On 11/25/25, LPA received R1’s hospital discharge records and Home Health agency visit reports via email and revealed that R1 was discharged from the hospital back to the board and care on 10/28/25, with assigned home health care. According to discharge records, Resident 1 (R1) was diagnosed with a unspecified pressure wound (no stage noted) on the right fifth toe and sepsis in the body. The records note the presence of an infection, but do not indicate whether the infection had spread or become persistent." Continue on LIC809-C At the time of this visit LPAs spoke with the Administrator and the Administrator acknowledged that R1 was readmitted back to the facility while was getting antibiotics for unspecified infection through the IV Pick line. The Administrator verified that prior to readmission, she failed to contact Licensing Office to request an exception to readmit and/or retain the resident with the health conditions requiring higher level of care. LPAs spoke with the Administrator and informed them the time if resident’s readmission on 10/28/25 the facility was operating in major noncompliance with Title 22 Regulations that posed an immediate risk to R1’s health and safety. Based on today’s inspection, observation and record review, the following deficiencies were cited and recorded on LIC809D. During exit interview, the Administrator was informed that immediate Civil Penalty will be issued for readmission and retention of the resident with prohibited health condition. Deficiencies issued during today’s visit, check LIC809D pages. Exit interview conducted, copy of this report signed and delivered.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87455(c)(2)Type A

    Acceptance and Retention Limitations (c)No resident shall be accepted or retained if any of the following apply:(2) The resident requires 24-hour, skilled nursing or intermediate care […]This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, records review and interview, the administrator revealed that R1 was re-admitted to the facility with IV PICC line that required 24h nursing assistance posed an immediate Health [..] risk to persons in care.

  • 87616(a)Type B

    (a) As specified in Section 87209, Program Flexibility, the licensee may submit a written exception request agrees that the resident has a prohibited and/or restrictive health condition but believes that the intent of the law can be met through alternative means. This requirement was not met as evidenced by Based on records reviewed and interview held with Administrator which revealed that R1 was re-admitted to the facility prior to submitting and received an exception request approval, which posed a potential health and safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 8, 2025 inspection of WOODLAKE LOVING CARE LLC?

This was a other inspection of WOODLAKE LOVING CARE LLC on December 8, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to WOODLAKE LOVING CARE LLC on December 8, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Acceptance and Retention Limitations (c)No resident shall be accepted or retained if any of the following apply:(2) The ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.