Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

GOLDEN ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 197609621
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(continued from LIC 9099-C) Regarding the allegation that a resident developed a Stage 4 pressure injury while in care, it was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) had multiple pressure wounds including a stage 4 pressure wound when admitted to the hospital on 05/12/24. IB Investigator , Hector ’s record review on 06/23/24 revealed that R1 was admitted to hospice on 11/30/22 and had been treating R1’s wound since then and the last visit for wound care was on 05/10/24. Investigator Hector’s interview with the hospice nurse on 07/23/24 at 4:32 PM, revealed that the nurse had been treating R1 since November 2022 . W hen R1 presented with wound s , more frequent visits were implemented to care for R1’s wound s and an additional visit from Omni Wounds doctor was implemented to care for R1’s wound s . Further interview with the nurse also revealed that the facility communicated with the hospice agency regarding R1’s wound progress and overall health condition and kept R1 “dry” at all times. Additionally, the nurse and IB Investigator’s interview with the facility A dministrator on 07/23/24 at 2:30 PM, R1 on 07/31/24 at 11:46 AM confirmed that R1, though wheelchair bound, was able to ambulate on R1’s own. Regarding the allegation that Resident sustained an unexplained fracture while in care, it was alleged that R1 had a rib fracture when admitted to the hospital on 05/12/24. IB investigator Hector’s interview with hospital staff on 07/30/24 at 9:10 AM, revealed that the doctor who initially saw R1 did not report of chest/rib pain. Investigator Hector’s interview with the hospice nurse on 07/23/24 at 4:32 PM revealed that R1 never complained of any chest/rib pain while treating R1 therefore the hospice agency was not aware of R1 ’s rib fracture. Investigator Hector’s interview with the facility A dministrator on 07/23/24 at 2:30 PM also revealed that they were not aware of R1’s rib fracture as R1 never complained of pain on the rib/chest area. Investigator Hector’s interview with R1 on 07/31/24 at 11:46 AM confirmed that even R1 was not aware of any rib fracture as R1 “didn’t feel it”. Regarding the allegation that Staff did not seek medical attention to resident in a timely manner, it was alleged that R1 was admitted to the hospital for failure to thrive, declining mental and physical status. LPA’s record review on 05/17/24 revealed that R1 was admitted at the facility on 10/05/22 and was admitted to hospice care on 11/30/22 and was able to communicate their needs to the facility. Investigator Hector’s interview with the facility A dministrator on 07/23/24 at 2:30 PM, revealed that R1 was declining since February 2024 but was still alert, oriented and still went outside the facility to smoke. (continued to LIC 9099-C) (continued from LIC 9099-C) LPA’s interview with the administrator on 05/17/24 at around 1:30 PM revealed that on 05/10/24, R1 complained of not being well but refused to go to the hospital and instead requested a family visit. Family members who regularly visit R1 came on 05/11/24 but another family member , a first-time visitor, came on 05/12/24 and called 911 for R1. R1 initially refused to go to the hospital but eventually agreed. Investigator Hector’s interview with R1 on 07/31/24 at 11:46 AM revealed that the facility provided assistance when R1 needed it and whenever R1 asked for it. Based on the information gathered during the course of the investigation, including interviews, and record reviews, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time Exit interview conducted and report issued.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 80087(a)(5)Type B

    Based on LPA's observation and recrod review, the menu is not being followed for every meal that being served in the faclility, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87219(f)Type B

    Based on observation and record review there is no activity calendar posted in the premises so the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 16, 2025 inspection of GOLDEN ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of GOLDEN ASSISTED LIVING on January 16, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to GOLDEN ASSISTED LIVING on January 16, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.