complaint·March 30, 2023

Interviews with the Administrator and staff revealed the behavior exhibited by R1 was normal and meant to be affectionate. Staff #1 (S1) stated they were present and supervising R1 and R2 the entire time. S1 stated an additional staff member was also observing R1 and R2. S1 further stated that both S1 and S2 are not verbally proficient, so they typically interact with others through physical touch. At 1:35 p.m. on 03/30/2023, LPA and S1 observed R1 interact with R2 through physical touch of hands. The interaction was friendly and not physical or violent. Record review of R1 and R2’s service plans confirmed the facility should promote their socialization. Based on video footage review, interviews, observations, and record review, the evidence gathered does not support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.