Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegation: Questionable death. On 12/06/2021, the Department received a complaint alleging that the facility caused the death of Resident #1 (R1) by overdosing R1 with morphine. Per record review, R1 was admitted to the facility on 09/28/2021 and received hospice services up until R1’s death on 12/01/2021. Per record review, R1’s Doctor’s Worksheet for Certificate of Death listed R1’s cause of death A) Cardiorespiratory arrest B) Dementia lewy body C) Atherosclerosis heart disease D) HTN. Record review of R1’s Pathology report dated 03/21/2022 did not include any abnormalities that could be a raise for concern. Interview with R1’s POA on 12/10/2021 did not raise any concerns regarding the care of R1. R1’s POA stated that R1’s POA was at the facility every day prior to R1’s death and had no issues with the intake of R1’s morphine. R1’s POA stated that R1’s POA communicated with R1’s doctors and hospice agency regarding R1’s medication and R1’s POA was in charge of R1’s medical care. Interview with the Licensee revealed that R1’s POA was very involved in R1’s care and medical care. The Licensee stated that the amount of morphine was given to R1 as instructed by R1’s doctor. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: Resident not accorded dignity in relationship with staff. On 12/06/2021, the Department received a complaint alleging that the facility staff were "mean" to Resident #1 (R1). Interview with R1’s POA on 12/10/2021 did not raise any concerns regarding the treatment of R1. R1’s POA stated that the facility staff were “wonderful and the care was phenomenal.” Interview with the Licensee did not reveal any issues between staff and R1. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 29, 2023 inspection of SWEET HOME SENIOR LIVING FACILITY?

This was a complaint inspection of SWEET HOME SENIOR LIVING FACILITY on December 29, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SWEET HOME SENIOR LIVING FACILITY on December 29, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.