Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegation: Facility retained resident with a prohibited health condition. On 01/29/2024, the Department received a complaint alleging that the Licensee admitted Resident #1 (R1) to the facility with an unstageable wound/ ulcer. R1 was admitted to Sweet Home Senior Living Facility on 01/26/2024. Prior to living at the facility, R1 was admitted to Country Villa Sheraton Nursing Center, a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) from 12/28/2023 to 01/26/2024. R1 was admitted to the SNF for rehab, and received physical therapy, occupational therapy, wound care and medical management. R1 discharged themselves from the SNF against medical advice and was admitted to Sweet Home Senior Living Facility with the plan of having home health. During R1’s stay at the SNF, R1 developed a pressure ulcer on their sacrum. Interview conducted with the Licensee stated that the Licensee received a referral for R1 through a placement agency and the Licensee went to go visit R1 at the SNF to get more information regarding R1’s level of care on 01/25/2024. The Licensee said that the SNF nurse stated that R1 had a wound stage 3 or 4 but did not provide any documentation or paperwork to support the claim. The Licensee stated that R1 would be getting home health through Kaiser Permanente and wound care would be provided for R1. The Licensee believed at the time of R1’s admission to the facility that R1 had a stage 2 wound. Per record review, R1’s ulcer is located on R1’s sacrum and is listed as unspecified in R1’s Kaiser Progress Notes (dated 01/19/2024) and Skilled Nursing Facility Discharge Summary (dated 01/24/2024). R1’s sacrum ulcer was noted as unstageable only in one document, Progress Notes dated 01/22/2024 from Kaiser. R1’s Progress Notes were not provided to the Licensee prior to admission. The documents that the Licensee obtained from the SNF include R1’s Admission Record, Interdisciplinary Discharge Summary and Kaiser Permanente Skilled Nursing Facility Discharge Instructions. None of the listed documents noted R1’s ulcer as unstageable. Although it was alleged that the Licensee was verbally told about R1’s unstageable ulcer, the SNF or Kaiser did not provide documentation to the Licensee that documented R1’s ulcer as unstageable nor did the Licensee obtained Kaiser documents. Additionally, the LPA conducted an interview with R1’s Home Health on 2/22/2024. Interview revealed that R1’s wound improved and had no concerns regarding R1 care at the facility. Home health records did not list the stage of the ulcer. Continued on LIC 9099-C. The LPA did not have sufficient documentation to support the allegation. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. The LPA had several conversations with the Licensee regarding pressure injuries, healing wounds, and Restricted Health Conditions. The LPA educated the Licensee on the importance of not accepting residents with Stage 3, Stage 4 pressure injuries and unstageable wounds/ injuries unless with a hospice waiver and with resident receiving care for the pressure injury from a physician or an appropriately skilled professional. The LPA reminded the Licensee that she should be obtaining pertinent documents for all residents including hospital records. The LPA told the Licensee if a hospital or SNF verbally state that a resident has any kind of wounds or ulcers, that the Licensee needs to follow up appropriately and ensure that the resident is appropriate for the assisted living. The LPA also emphasized the importance of the Licensee obtaining home health and hospice plan of care and wound assessment documents to keep in resident’s file. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 11, 2024 inspection of SWEET HOME SENIOR LIVING FACILITY?

This was a complaint inspection of SWEET HOME SENIOR LIVING FACILITY on July 11, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SWEET HOME SENIOR LIVING FACILITY on July 11, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.