Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from 9099 LPA's medication audits revealed R1 did have a 7 day pill case stored with their medication , but it was observed to be empty at that time. The Medication Administration Records (MAR) indicated that medications for the residents were administered as prescribed at this time. LPA also checked resident medications for expiration dates and instructions and the LPA uncovered minimal discrepancies. The LPA reviewed facility incident reports, and the LPA was unable to uncover incident reports as it related to known medication errors. Interviews revealed that staff did not recall specific occurrences where medication errors occurred. LPA's Interview with (4) four residents in care revealed they did not express any concerns as it related to receiving their medications. LPA's interview with seven (7) staff revealed they could not recall a time when a resident did not receive a medication due to error. Based on the information gathered during the investigation, the department does not have sufficient evidence to confirm this allegation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that Staff mishandled a resident’s medication while in care has been deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was reported that Staff did not address a resident’s change in condition while in care, as it was alleged that facility staff did not report to R1’s home health nurse that R1 has not had a bowel movement for several days. Interviews conducted and records review revealed that R1’s home health nurse would visit R1 approximately twice a week and each time the home health nurse visited they were regularly notified about changes of condition in R1 by Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2). Updates were also provided to the home health nurse via phone calls, emails and resident records kept at the facility. LPA records review of resident records from September 2021 to January 2022 revealed bowel movements were recorded and updated regularly during that time. Interviews conducted with seven (7) staff further revealed that if they observed a change of condition in any resident, they would notify the Administrator and notate their observations in the resident’s file. All (7) staff also indicated that when any home health nurse conducted visits, they would always update the nurse about their patient. Based on the information gathered during the investigation, the department does not have sufficient evidence to confirm this allegation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that Staff did not address a resident’s change in condition while in case has been deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report issued.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(h)(5)Type B

    87465(h)(5) Incidental Medical and Dental Care - Each resident's medication shall be stored in its originally received container. No medications shall be transferred between containers.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interview, LPA the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as (6) residents had medications pre-poured and out of their original containers for more than 24 hours which poses a potential health risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 30, 2023 inspection of COTTAGES OF LAKE BALBOA 3, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of COTTAGES OF LAKE BALBOA 3, THE on October 30, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to COTTAGES OF LAKE BALBOA 3, THE on October 30, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.