Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

LEISURE GARDEN SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITYLicense 1976100321 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(continued from LIC9099) Allegation #1: Facility failed to conduct a proper pre-admission appraisal. It was alleged the facility admitted Resident #1 (R1) without knowledge of R1's restricted health condition. LPA's interview with R1 confirmed the use of a catheter. R1 informed LPA facility staff claims they first saw the catheter when R1 was brought into the facility on a gurney. R1 states they were not aware the facility did not know about the catheter as a representative from the facility had visited them in person prior to admittance. LPA's interview with the administrator revealed they did not know about the catheter and had received R1's skilled nursing record the same day the resident was admitted to the facility. According to the administrator they would not have accepted R1 had they known R1 had a catheter. Furthermore, according to the administrator the consultant used for placement assistance had not mentioned the presence of a catheter. According to the administrator they admitted R1 based on the information gathered from the consultant. Interview with the consultant corroborates they visited R1 on behalf of the facility and did not see the catheter bag. The consultant informed LPA they conducted an interview with R1. LPA's review of SNF paperwork confirms R1's use of catheter. LPA's review of the Preplacement Appraisal Information (LIC603) is dated the same date R1 was admitted to the facility. On the LIC603 Services Needed for Toileting, including assistance equipment, or assistance of another person is checked "Yes" with no explanation as to what kind of assistance R1 will need. LPA's review of hospital discharge paperwork after admittance to the facility confirmed resident has been released back to facility without Home Health services on different occasions. According to the administrator, the facility has created a plan to find a suitable facility for R1. Since R1 now qualifies for assistance, the facility is able to assess R1 and place an order for Home Health until a suitable facility is found. Based on record review and interviews, although the facility claims they did not know about the catheter, the consultant used represented the facility when they visited the resident in person. Either the consultant did not conduct a proper functional capabilities evaluation, or the facility did not interview R1 and failed to complete the preplacement appraisal prior to admission. Therefore, this allegation is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. Deficiency cited (refer to LIC9099-D). Copy of report provided. (Continued from LIC9099-A) LPA's interview with R1 confirmed the use of a catheter. R1 informed LPA facility staff claims they first saw the catheter when they were brought into the facility on a gurney. R1 states they were not aware the facility did not know about the catheter as a representative from the facility had visited them in person prior to admittance. LPA's interview with the administrator revealed they did not know about the catheter and had received R1's skilled nursing record the same day the resident was admitted to the facility. According to the administrator they would not have accepted R1 had they known R1 had a catheter. Furthermore, they contacted the Skilled Nursing Facility and attempted to return the resident but could not. According to the administrator the consultant used for placement assistance and the skilled nursing facility had not mentioned the presence of a catheter. According to R1 and the administrator the facility staff do not assist with the catheter because staff at the facility are not appropriately skilled professionals or have been trained by one to assist R1 with their catheter. According to R1 they would prefer to be transferred to a skilled nursing facility. According to the administrator they immediately call 911 to have R1 transported to the hospital when catheter needs arise. R1 confirmed that due to mitigating circumstances, they did not qualify for Home Health services upon release to the facility on one occasion, and the facility staff are not able to provide assistance with restricted health conditions. LPA's review of hospital discharge paperwork after admittance to the facility confirmed resident was released back to facility without Home Health services. According to the administrator, the facility has created a plan to find a suitable facility for R1. Since R1 now qualifies for assistance, the facility is able to assess R1 and place an order for Home Health. Based on record review and interviews although the facility failed to observe R1's use of a catheter prior to admitting them to the facility they have sought medical attention to address R1's catheter needs until a suitable facility is found. Therefore this allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87457(c)(1)(A)Type B

    87457 Pre-Admission Appraisal (c)Prior to admission... (1)The appraisal shall document, at a minimum:(A) An evaluation of the prospective resident's functional capabilities,... as specified in Sections 87459, Functional Capabilities... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and resident records review the licensee failed to conduct a proper preplacement evaluation with R1 to make sure the facility was suitable for R1 which is an immediate health and safety risk to resident in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 12, 2025 inspection of LEISURE GARDEN SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY?

This was a complaint inspection of LEISURE GARDEN SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY on March 12, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to LEISURE GARDEN SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY on March 12, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87457 Pre-Admission Appraisal (c)Prior to admission... (1)The appraisal shall document, at a minimum:(A) An evaluation o..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.