complaint·August 7, 2025

(continued from LIC 9099) LPA's interview with R2 today at 11:33 AM, however, revealed that R1 asked R2 to massage R1 at the back so R2 did but denied choking R1 in any way because it was only massaging R1's nape and not R1's throat. LPA's interview with the Administrator today at 10:30 AM and Assistant Administrator on 05/20/25 revealed that when R1 reported to them the incident R1 stated that the incident happened in R1's room and when they interview R2, R2 denied choking R1. LPA's interview with both R1 & R2 confirmed that there was no one else present in the parking area when the incident occurred. LPA's record review on 05/20/25 also revealed that there was no camera installed at the parking area so there was no record of the alleged choking incident. LPA's interview with two (2) residents that are both living in the same building as R1 and rooms were adjacent to R1 revealed that they did not witness R2 being rough to R1 and coming to R1's room during early morning hours. Based on the information gathered during this and prior visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.