Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

PALACE OF JOYLicense 1976101522 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi, met with the staff Keneshbek Minzhasharov , and the Administrator Marine Grigoryan was contacted via phone and LPA explained the reason for the case management visit. The purpose of the case management visit is to address deficiencies observed during the course of complaint # 31-AS-20250516105015, The deficiencies were not alleged but observed by LPA. During the visit, LPA was informed that R1 is having behavior issues/incidents on daily basis. Furthermore, on 05/02/2025, R1 had a bowel movement incident. On 03/27/25, R2 was taken to the hospital by calling 9-1-1 for shortness of breath. However, no incident reports were submitted to the Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD) in a timely manner for R1 and R2. LPA reviewed all incident reports on a system and did not observe any Incident Reports regarding R1. In addition, the Administrator admitted that no incident was submitted to the Regional Office (RO). Based on Title 22 Regulation: a written Unusual Incident/Injury Report shall be submitted to CCLD within seven (7) days of occurrence. LPA informed the Administrator that all staff members are mandated reporters and they are all responsible for reporting. LPA informed the Administrator to submit an incident report that occurred on: 05/02/25 for R1 All other incidents (related to R1) 03/27/25 (R2) hospitalization Moreover, upon arrival to the facility LPA conducted interviews and concluded that two (2) out of two (2) staff were not able to communicate in English with the residents of which the majority speak English. Furthermore, interviews with five (5) out of six (6) residents who were able to communicate confirmed that Continue on LIC 809C they have trouble communicating with staff for their basic needs. Lastly, during today's visit both staff used translator application on their phone to communicate/interview with LPA. Therefore, a deficiency will be issued. Lastly, during the course of investigation LPA observed a small scratch on R2's nose. During the interview LPA was informed that R2 was physically abused by Staff #1 (S1). LPA observed that R2 was not consistent with the information provided to LPA. LPA conducted a file review of R2 and observed that R2 is diagnosed with dementia, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, and two staff. All parties interviewed denied ever witnessing or physically abusing anyone in the facility. Therefore, due to the lack of evidence LPA was unable to conclude that R2 was ever physical abused by facility staff. Deficiencies cited during today's visit and appeal rights explained and given. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87211(a)(1)AType B

    87211(a)(1)A,B&D-Reporting Requirements: (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports... (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person... ... any of the events specified in (A), (B) & (D)...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not notifying CCLD regarding R1's and R2's incident reports which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87411(d)(3)Type B

    87411-Personnel Requirements General-(d)(3)Skill and knowledge required to provide necessary resident care and supervision, including the ability to communicate with residents.,.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA’s interview and observation, the administrator does not have staff available to communicate with residents to provide care which poses a potential risk to the residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 20, 2025 inspection of PALACE OF JOY?

This was a other inspection of PALACE OF JOY on May 20, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to PALACE OF JOY on May 20, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "87211(a)(1)A,B&D-Reporting Requirements: (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports... (1) A w..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.