Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

PALACE OF JOYLicense 197610152
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Staff untrained providing care and supervision to residents . It was alleged that staff were untrained and providing care and supervision to residents. To investigate, LPA interviewed the Administrator, Staff #1 (S1), Staff #2 (S2), and four (4) out of four (4) residents , and reviewed staff training records. The Administrator stated that all direct-care staff receive initial training upon hire, including dementia care, medication administration, residents’ rights, facility policies, and reporting requirements, and competency is verified through daily observation by the Administrator . S1 and S2 stated they received initial and ongoing training and are able to perform assigned duties. During the facility tour and observations, LPA noted staff providing care and supervision to residents. Four (4) out of four (4) residents interviewed stated their care needs are being met and expressed no concerns. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, this allegation is Unsubstantiated . Allegation: Staff unable to communicate residents’ needs due to language barrier. It was alleged that staff were unable to communicate residents’ needs due to a language barrier. To investigate, LPA interviewed the Administrator, S1, S2, and four (4) out of four (4) residents . The Administrator stated that at least one English-speaking staff member is present on each shift. S1 and S2 stated they communicate effectively with residents. During the facility tour and observations, LPA noted staff effectively communicating with residents, and residents responding appropriately. Four (4) out of four (4) residents interviewed stated they are able to communicate their basic needs and had no concerns. Based on interviews and observations, this allegation is Unsubstantiated . Allegation: Staff does not follow the posted food menu It was alleged that staff failed to follow the posted food menu and provided a poor diet to residents in care. To investigate, LPA interviewed the Administrator, Staff #1 (S1), Staff #2 (S2), and four (4) out of four (4) residents . LPA reviewed the facility’s sample menu and observed food items in the refrigerator and throughout the facility that matched the sample menu. During the initial and subsequent complaint visits, LPA conducted a physical plant tour and observed nutritious food available to residents. All four (4) residents interviewed stated that meals are adequate and not poor in quality. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, this allegation is Unsubstantiated . Appeal rights explained. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 10, 2026 inspection of PALACE OF JOY?

This was a complaint inspection of PALACE OF JOY on February 10, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PALACE OF JOY on February 10, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.