Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

OAKMONT OF VALENCIALicense 197610183
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

After review of the information received the allegation, Insufficient staffing is unsubstantiated at this time. Interviews with 9 out of 11 residents, who are able to communicate, indicated that staff are meeting their needs within a timely manner and are happy with service. LPA conducted a random inspection of the pendant at 11:51 am, staff responded within a reasonable time at 11:59 am. The facilities expectation for response time is 15 min. Interviews with 2 out of 3 staff indicate that there is sufficient staffing to meet the needs of the resident’s timely due to their communication with each other. Two (2) out of three (3) staff indicate that there is a staffing issue when someone calls in sick, however a manager will step in the position of caregiver to assist and help staff. Interview also indicated that the MedTech will step to assist caregivers as needed . Allegation: Facility failed to provide activities for the residents. It is alleged that there are no activities offered by the facility. LPA conducted interviews with 9 out of 11 residents, who are able to communicate, and 3 staff members. Information from interviews revealed that since the onset of Covid-19 the facility does not offer as many activities due to wanting to social distance and keep residents safe. Interviews with residents did show that the facility still conducts bingo, exercise, coloring, music, ect. During todays visit, facility hired a pianist and at 12:40pm LPA observed 25 residents from Memory Care Unit were engaged in singing, dancing and listening to a music. Based on the information obtained through interviews and observation this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Facility staff failed to meet residents’ hygiene needs. LPA interviewed 9 out of 11 residents, who are able to communicate, and was informed that facility staff always takes good care of them (pull-ups being changed every 2 hours or as needed, showers are being provided twice weekly or as needed). LPA observed all residents wearing clean clothes, smelled good and being well groomed. LPA also observed the entire facility being clean and free from odor. Based on the information obtained through interviews and observation this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Facility staff failed to provide adequate food service Regarding the allegation that staff are not providing residents with food of good quality, LPA interview with nine (9) residents, who were able to communicate, and revealed that nine (9) residents believe that the quality of the food being served at the facility is okay or good. Continue on LIC9099-C LPA record review and observation also revealed that the facility provides complete meal with fruit and vegetable servings on every meal and staff interview reveals that kitchen staff also customize food being served upon resident's request. Moreover, LPA was informed that the weekly menu may vary and daily menu provides options and alternate option for the residents to choose. Based on the information gathered during this visit, this allegations is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Facility staff failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment LPA interviewed three (3) staff members, Regional Memory Care Specialist, LVN, Activity Coordinator and Executive Director. LPA was informed that Memory Care Unit residents were wondering out of their room during the COVID outbreak and the facility staff followed COVID protocols and re-directed them back into their rooms. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Facility staff are not taking any precautions for COVID-19 It was alleged that the facility staff are not taking any precautions for COVID-19 and are not practicing social distancing. LPA conducted a physical plant tour on this 02/02/22 and observed signs throughout the facility promoting mask wearing and social distancing. LPA also observed staff wearing masks throughout the facility. Based on LPA observations, the facility takes adequate precautions for COVID-19. Based on information obtained, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.33Type B

    Posting requirements 1569.33(h)(2)(2) Each residential care facility for the elderly shall post this poster in the main entryway of its facility.This requirement was not met as evidenced by Based on observations made by LPA on 1/11/22 at 11:09am, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, in posting the Ombudsman’s poster in the main entryway, which posed a potential health, safety risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.69(a)(1)Type B

    §1569.69 Employees assisting residents with self-administration of medication; training requirements (1) In facilities licensed to provide care for 16 or more persons, the employee shall complete 24 hours of initial training....This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, licensee failed to ensure staff were provided the required 24 hours of initial training, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87465(h)(6)AType B

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (6) The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescriptions...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews, licensee did not comply with the section above, as facility staff handling medications were not properly documenting prescribed and PRN medications on CSMDR, which poses a potential health and safety rist to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 2, 2022 inspection of OAKMONT OF VALENCIA?

This was a complaint inspection of OAKMONT OF VALENCIA on February 2, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to OAKMONT OF VALENCIA on February 2, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.