Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

OAKMONT OF VALENCIALicense 1976101833 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA observed R3’s prescribed, narcotic medication was filled on 11/24/21 (in bubble pack) for AM, Noon and PM and was not documented on CSMDR. The Administrator and staff stated that they were not aware of as to why some medications were not documented. When LPA requested to see PRN medication records for the same residents, LPA was informed that PRN records were kept in a main resident’s file, per previous MedTech’s request. LPA informed the Administrator that all medication related documents shall be kept in one file to ensure an accuracy of a proper documentation and requested that all staff handling medication shall take/re-take medication training. Based on interviews and observations made by LPA on 1/11/22 at 11:28am this allegation is deemed Substantiated. Allegation: Facility staff are not adequately trained. S1 stated that their training on passing medications consisted of a brief explanation from the outgoing staff member about when to give AM vs PM medications. At 11:50am LPA asked the administrator for proof of S1's training and was given a one page paper that listed hours for various topics, including 6hrs for medications, but did not specify the day the training was given or by whom. Based on interviews and LPA observations this allegation is deemed Substantiated. Allegation: Facility's signage is not properly posted On an initial visit, made on 1/11/22, LPA was able to tour the facility at 11:09am and interview the Administrator. While conducting a tour of the common areas, Administrator stated that the Ombudsman’s poster is placed on a second floor, in an activity room. LPA was able to observe the Ombudsman's poster, along with all licensing posters, posted in a frame. LPA requested that all posters that contain information on the appropriate reporting agency in case of a complaint or emergency shall be posted in the main entryway of the facility. Based on the information obtained through interviews and observation this allegation is deemed Substantiated. Exit interview conducted, copy of report and appeal rights provided to the Administrator.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.33Type B

    Posting requirements 1569.33(h)(2)(2) Each residential care facility for the elderly shall post this poster in the main entryway of its facility.This requirement was not met as evidenced by Based on observations made by LPA on 1/11/22 at 11:09am, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, in posting the Ombudsman’s poster in the main entryway, which posed a potential health, safety risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.69(a)(1)Type B

    §1569.69 Employees assisting residents with self-administration of medication; training requirements (1) In facilities licensed to provide care for 16 or more persons, the employee shall complete 24 hours of initial training....This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, licensee failed to ensure staff were provided the required 24 hours of initial training, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87465(h)(6)AType B

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (6) The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescriptions...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews, licensee did not comply with the section above, as facility staff handling medications were not properly documenting prescribed and PRN medications on CSMDR, which poses a potential health and safety rist to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 2, 2022 inspection of OAKMONT OF VALENCIA?

This was a complaint inspection of OAKMONT OF VALENCIA on February 2, 2022. 3 citations were issued: 3 Type B.

Were any citations issued to OAKMONT OF VALENCIA on February 2, 2022?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (0 Type A, 3 Type B). The first citation was for: "Posting requirements 1569.33(h)(2)(2) Each residential care facility for the elderly shall post this poster in the main ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.