Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

OAKMONT OF VALENCIALicense 1976101835 citations on this visit
5 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

No update resident appraisal observed. LPA conducted interviews with four (4) out of four (4) staff on 11/07/2022, and Neptune Society staff, 11/08/2022. Investigator Ferris, conducted interviews with, witnesses (on 11/30/22), Primary Care Physician (on 12/19/22), nine (9) out of nine (9) staff members (on 11/30/22, 12/27/22. 12/28/22 and 12/29/22), Los Angeles County Department of Medical Examiner-Coroner-Investigator (on 01/26/23), and subpoenaed Los Angeles County Fire Department Response Repot and 911 Audio (on 12/15/22) and reviewed on 12/20/22. Allegation: Resident died due to staff administering the wrong medication The investigation findings revealed that R1 had been living at this facility since September 28, 2019. Although, R1 was able to independently ambulate throughout the facility, due to the use of full-time oxygen, R1 had a wheelchair as a backup (in case of fall or weakness). In addition, findings revealed that R1 was able to manage his/her own medications and due to R1’s changes in medical condition, R1’s responsible party requested the facility to start managing/storing R1’s medications as of October 1 st , 2022. During the Case Management Visit, conducted by LPA Panushkina on 11/07/22 at 12:05pm, LPA requested R1’s Centrally Stored Medications and Destruction Record (SCMDR) and observed no document was available. When LPA asked S3 why R1’s SCMDR record was left blank, S3 was unable to give an explanation and informed LPA that he/she just recently (as of October 2022) got hired. LPA also observed R1’s Appraisal Needs and Services Plan and or resident reappraisal, last dated on 06/30/2021, was not updated. During the course of investigation, LPA was also informed by S6 that although, S1 completed all required (by Oakmont) medication training, in September 2022, S1 expressed concerns numerous times to the staff and management about not being confident to independently administer medications to the residents and was scheduled to work without being provided an additional training/re-training. On 11/06/2022, S1 failed to ensure the medications were correctly dispensed and administered five (5) incorrect medications to resident (R1), which were prescribed to another resident (R2). Moreover, the facility failed to obtain timely medical attention for R1. Upon discovery that R1 was administered five (5) incorrect medications, staff was allegedly instructed to frequently check on R1 and obtain his/her "vitals", (i.e., R1’s blood pressure and oxygen saturation levels). First, no documentation was produced to show R1 was checked on at any time and no documentation was produced to show R1’s "vitals" were checked, upon Investigator Ferris’s request (on 11/30/22 and on 01/11/23). Continue on LIC9099-C Second, S3 provided names of staff, to Investigator Ferris, whom he/she instructed to check on R1. Those staff were interviewed by the Investigator and denied being instructed to check on R1, denied checking on R1, and denied knowledge of the incident. There was no documentation or statements made to show any measures were taken to decrease the potential for a negative outcome from the medication error. Finally, neither emergency medical services (911), R1's Primary Care Physician, Poison Control, nor R1's family were contacted immediately after discovering R1 was given five (5) incorrect medications and no medical attention or intervention of any kind was obtained for R1 prior to death. In addition, LPA reviewed the facility’s Medication Management-General Policy on 11/17/2022. According to the “Policy #7: The medication error must be investigated by the Health Services Director (HSD) or designee. The HSD will identify the appropriate follow-up, including the notification of the responsible party and healthcare practitioner.” Based on the information gathered, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the above allegation is Substantiated. A $500 immediate civil penalty is assessed today for a violation resulting R1's death. The Licensee/Executive Director were informed that additional civil penalties might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) or (f). Exit interview conducted. Civil penalties assessed and appeal rights explained. Report reviewed, signed, and delivered.

Citations

7 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87705(4)Type A

    Care of Persons with Dementia(4) There is an adequate number of direct care staff to support each resident’s physical, social, emotional, safety and health care needs as identified in his/her current appraisal.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the information obtained, by the Investigator, Licensee/Administrator did not comply with the section cited above by knowing that R1 needed 1:1 staffing and did not put into current appraisal as the appraisal was never updated, which poses/posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents is care.

  • 87705(c)(5)(A)Type A

    Care of Persons with Dementia(c) Licensees who accept and retain residents with dementia... (5) Each resident with dementia... A) When any medical assessment... ...corresponding changes shall be made...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the information obtained, by the Investigator, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by failing to provide an updated care plan to address R1's chronic falls, which poses/posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87405(b)Type A

    87405 Administrator - Qualifications and Duties(b) The administrator of a facility or facilities shall have the responsibility and authority to carry out the policies of the licensee. Based on the investigation, the Administrator/Executive Director did not comply with the section cited above, failing to follow and carry out medication policy, which poses/posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87411(d)(4)Type A

    87411 Personnel Requirements-General(d) All personnel shall be given on the job training... This training and/or related experience shall provide knowledge of and skill in the following... (4) Knowledge required to safely assist with prescribed medications...This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on the investigation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, for Staff #1 (S1), which poses/posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87462(a)Type B

    87463 Reappraisals(a) The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate. Based on review of documentation during investigation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not completing a resident appraisal due to changes in R1’s medical condition that required the assistance with medications management, which poses/posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87465(g)Type A

    87465(g) Incidental Medical and Dental Care. The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health....This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on the investigation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as staff did not seek medical attention for R1 in a timely manner, which poses/posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87466Type A

    87466 Observation of the Resident. The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on the investigation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having a staff regularly check on or document any changes as agreed upon, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 29, 2023 inspection of OAKMONT OF VALENCIA?

This was a complaint inspection of OAKMONT OF VALENCIA on March 29, 2023. 5 citations were issued: 4 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to OAKMONT OF VALENCIA on March 29, 2023?

Yes, 5 citations were issued (4 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Care of Persons with Dementia(4) There is an adequate number of direct care staff to support each resident’s physical, s..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.