Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

OAKMONT OF VALENCIALicense 197610183
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

orders and resubmitted them to the pharmacy. The pharmacy did not receive the updated prescriptions until 06/25/2023, at which point the medication was processed, filled, and delivered to the facility. R1 started the new prescription on 06/25/2023. After reviewing R1’s hospital records, LPA determined that the facility contacted R1’s primary doctor as soon as they became aware that the medication had not been received. R1’s doctor’s office then contacted the pharmacy to verify the prescriptions, and the medication was delivered once the orders were clarified. Therefore, the facility administered the medication according to the doctor’s orders once it was received from the pharmacy. Based on the documentation reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. As a result, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation # 2: It was alleged that staff did not ensure a resident was properly positioned in bed, resulting in a fall. To investigate the complaint, on 07/23/2023 , 12/03/2024 , and 02/06/2025 , at various times between 9:45 a.m. and 3:30 p.m ., (LPA) conducted interviews and reviewed relevant documents. According to the information obtained, Resident #1 (R1) experienced a change in condition, prompting the facility to enroll R1 in its fall management program. LPA received an incident report documenting that R1 had fallen but sustained no injuries. Although it was reported that R1 may have been improperly positioned in bed, there is no evidence to substantiate the allegation. Therefore, based on the information gathered through interviews and document reviews, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation # 3: It was alleged staff do not ensure infection control policies are maintained. To investigate the complaint, on 07/23/2023, 12/03/2024, and today, 02/06/2025, from various timeframes, between 9:45 a.m . and 3:30 p.m . , (LPA) conducted interviews and reviewed documents relevant to the allegation. According to the information obtained, there have been no recent reported cases of residents contracting shingles or exposing others to the infection within the facility. However, it was revealed that Resident #2 (R2 ) had shingles over a year ago but was quarantined and remained in isolation in their room. Staff reported that meals and medication were provided to R2 in the room to prevent exposure to others. Neither staff nor residents interviewed by LPA reported any instance of a resident walking around the facility with a serious infection. Therefore, based on the interviews conducted, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. As a result, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time . Exit interview and copy of report provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 6, 2025 inspection of OAKMONT OF VALENCIA?

This was a complaint inspection of OAKMONT OF VALENCIA on February 6, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to OAKMONT OF VALENCIA on February 6, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.