Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

GARDENS AT NORTHRIDGE, THELicense 197610191
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. It is being alleged that the facility staff did not safeguard resident #1 (R1)’s personal belongings. During LPA’s interview with R1, R1 stated,” that they do not need help safeguarding their personal belongings and any other services. R1 continued to say that even though they can only see from one (1) eye they are independent.” LPA asked if they received a SPV- Safeguards for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Valuables form when they first arrived at the facility and R1 stated, “yes.” LPA received and reviewed R1’s Safeguards for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Valuables and it was noted that R1 had a PC/desk chair, love seat and chair, bed/dresser, bedside table, several pieces of insured jewelry and it was signed on 04/25/25 by R1. When LPA conducted a physical tour of R1’s room, all the items noted on the SPV form were in R1’s room including a Capital One credit card that R1 stated, “there was a fraudulent, unauthorized charge but I still have my card with me.” Four (4) staff were interviewed regarding R1’s belongings and confirmed that R1 safeguards their own personal belongings and R1 is very independent. LPA interviewed seven (7) other residents that confirmed that they have not had any missing items from their personal belongings. Therefore, based on the LPA's observations, record review, staff and resident interviews, the above allegation(s) above is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff financially abused resident. It is being alleged that fraudulent, unauthorized charge, was made to resident #1 (R1)’s credit card. When LPA interviewed R1, R1 stated, “at 6:50am on September 28, 2025, a staff entered their room and R1 told them to leave. Then at 7:01am, R1 noticed that someone had attempted to use their credit card because they received a fraudulent alert via email asking them if they had authorized a payment in the amount of $398.15 which was declined. R1 continued by saying that they immediately pressed their pendant that is on their neck and a staff member named Kathy came in to help them search for their purse which was on the bed and Kathy returned the $4.00 cash that was also previously missing from their purse.” When LPA was interviewing R1, LPA asked R1 if all their credit cards were in their purse and R1 stated, “I have everything nothing is missing.” LPA observed several credit cards and cash in R1’s purse. LIC 9099C-continued During the investigation, LPA was made aware that the staff that R1 had mentioned was working that day. Staff #1 (S1) works in the memory care area of the facility. LPA interviewed S1 and asked if they had any encounters with R1 and S1 stated, “no, I work in the Memory Care area so I don’t go to the Assisted Living Area unless there is a major problem.” In addition, LPA spoke to R1’s son via telephone and R1’s son stated, “that R1 makes a lot of purchases online.” Furthermore, LPA obtained the pendant, alarm history for R1 and of R1’s room number for September 28 th 2025. R1 pressed their pendant three (3) times on September 28, 2025. It was at 12:07pm, 4:47pm and 6:00pm. There was no pendant pressed from R1 and R1’s room at 7:01am on September 28, 2025 which R1 stated. Four (4) staff also confirmed that R1 does not need any help with any services except for taking out the trash and removing/making up their bed which is until 11:00am or so when R1 wakes up. Staff #2 (S2) stated that on September 28, 2025, R1 made another report at 7:00pm that their credit card was used for $46.01 online again for VIP GOATED which is for video games. In addition, LPA interviewed Staff # 3 (S3) that was assigned to R1’s room on September 28 , 2025 and S3 stated, “they did not go to R1’s room until 12:00pm or so when R1 pressed their pendant.” S3 then helped R1 find their purse and credit cards because R1 is blind in one (1) eye R1 needed help locating their purse and the S3 stated, “that R1 had some money in their purse with all their credit cards, no credit cards were missing because R1 specifically asked them to check for a specific credit card which was also there.” Therefore, based on the LPA's observations, staff and resident interviews, the above allegation(s) above is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. An exit interview was conducted, no citation(s) were issued, and a copy of this report was given to the executive director.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 13, 2025 inspection of GARDENS AT NORTHRIDGE, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of GARDENS AT NORTHRIDGE, THE on October 13, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to GARDENS AT NORTHRIDGE, THE on October 13, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.