Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

PALM VISTA SENIOR LIVINGLicense 197610286
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

needed. LPA interviewed four (4) out of twenty-six (26) staff members who stated residents have stated the facility staff accurately assessed resident’s needs. LPA interviewed six (6) out of sixty-three residents who stated staff accurately assessed resident’s needs. Therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation: Facility staff did not communicate with resident’s family members . It’s being alleged that the staff did not communicate to the residents and to their family members. LPA interviewed six (6) out of sixty-three residents who stated staff properly communicate with the resident and family members. Four (4) out of the twenty-six (26) staff members interviewed unanimously stated they communicate to the residents and their families. Therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated . Regarding the allegation: Facility staff did not provide needed care and assistance to the resident. It’s being alleged that the staff do not meet the resident’s needs. LPA interviewed six (6) out of sixty-three residents who stated staff provides the care they need. Four (4) out of the twenty-six (26) staff members interviewed unanimously stated they provide the care needed for each resident. It was also alleged that R1 was not taking medication and R1’s bed was soiled. Two med tech staff members confirmed R1 took medication as prescribed. R2 confirmed R1 and R2 lived in the same room and also confirmed that R1 had taken medication. R2 also stated staff changed R1’s bed when it was soiled. Six (6) out of sixty-three (63) residents who stated staff never miss giving their medication and if their bed is soiled, staff immediately change the linens. R1 did not want to be interviewed. Therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated . Regarding the allegation: Facility staff did not ensure that resident had hot water for showers .- It’s being alleged that there was no hot water at the facility and R1 did not shower for four weeks due to the lack of hot water. LPA interviewed six (6) out of sixty-three residents who stated there has not been any issues with the hot water. All six (6) residents confirmed they have not missed showering for four weeks. R1 did not want to be interviewed. Four (4) out of the twenty-six (26) staff members interviewed unanimously stated the facility has not had any hot water issues. The Administrator stated hot water was not available for one day when the facility opened but that the issue was repaired. Therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated . Regarding the allegation, Facility staff did not ensure that resident's room was free of clutter in the walkways . It was alleged that R1’s apartment was cluttered. During LPA’s visit on 5/04/2023, LPA observed R1’s apartment was not cluttered. Six (6) out of the sixty-three (63) residents stated their rooms have never been cluttered. Therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated . contd 9099-C Regarding the allegation, Resident sustained pressure injuries while in care …its alleged that a resident sustained pressure injuries while in care. LPA observed R1's documentation that R1 received wound care. Four (4) out of the twenty-six (26) staff members confirmed the residents received the care they need and residents have not developed wounds due to staff neglect. The Resident Care Director confirmed R1 received wound care but there are no residents at this time receiving wound care. Six (6) out of the sixty three (63) residents confirmed staff meet their needs and do not have any wounds. R1 refused to be interviewed. Therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated . Regarding the allegation , Facility staff did not ensure that resident was being fed while in care. It is alleged a resident (R1) did not receive meals because R1 would not go to the dining hall because R1 would be charged for staff assisting the resident to the dining hall. R2 confirmed since living in the room with R1, R2 went to the dining hall to pick up R1’s meals. Four (4) out of the twenty-six (26) staff members confirmed R2 picked R1’s meals every day. Six (6) out of the sixty-three (63) residents confirmed they receive three meals per day. Therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated . Regarding the allegation… Facility staff did not ensure that resident received medical attention while in care . It is alleged that staff did not provide transportation to R1 for doctor’s appointments. R2 confirmed they scheduled the trips to the doctor for R1. The Activities Director confirmed they drive residents to their doctor’s appointments. The Activities Director confirmed R2 made the reservations for R1 and R2 to be transported to doctor’s appointments. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated . Exit interview conducted and a copy of the sig ned report was given.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 19, 2024 inspection of PALM VISTA SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of PALM VISTA SENIOR LIVING on April 19, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PALM VISTA SENIOR LIVING on April 19, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.