Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

LEISURE VALE ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 197610442
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegation "Staff did not ensure personal property of resident was safely secured" it was alleged gold coins belonging to Resident #1 (R1) were stolen by Resident #2 (R2) when R1 hired R2 to clean their closet. At the time of this visit, LPA Reed conducted additional interviews with seventeen (17) residents, including R1 and other residents who entrusted their belongings to be safeguarded by the facility. Prior to this visit, Licensing Program Manager Naira Margaryan made a phone contact and spoke with the Business Office Manager and facility Administrator. At the time of this visit, LPA Reed requested additional records including inventory records for R1, a copy of the facility theft and loss policy, and a copy of incident report pertaining to allegation. Staff interviews revealed that R1 did not include theirgold coins on their inventory sheet. On 10/27/24, R1 reported to Business Office Manager that they hired R2 to clean their closet and R2 stole the coins and other valuables from R1. R1 contacted the police on their own and provided a police report number to the Business Office Manager. The investigation was initiated by the Glendale Police Department and concluded on 06/24/25. The police investigation revealed that R2 returned R1’s gold coins to them. A review of facility records verified the information revealed from staff. As per facility Theft and Loss policy, if resident reports missing articles and valuables exceeding $100, police are contacted to investigate the theft. During interviews, R1 stated that R2 actually returned their coins months ago, and R1 had lost them again at a market. R2 denied taking R1’s money or other valuables. Other residents interviewed during this investigation by LPA Reed did not address any concerns regarding their personal belongings. Based on interviews and record review it was concluded that although the allegation may have happened, there is not enough information to verify that facility failed to safeguard R1’s personal belonging and valuables. Therefore, the allegation deemed to be UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 25, 2025 inspection of LEISURE VALE ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of LEISURE VALE ASSISTED LIVING on June 25, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to LEISURE VALE ASSISTED LIVING on June 25, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.