Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

LEISURE VALE ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 1976104421 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegation: Staff did not ensure residents records were properly managed. It is being alleged that Resident #1 (R1) received a bill for blood they had withdrawn at the above facility. During LPA's interview with R1, R1 confirmed that they did not have proof of a bill that they were being charged on behalf of a blood draw. LPA interviewed sixteen (16) other residents that confirmed they have had blood withdrawn at the facility but they have never received a bill. LPA interviewed five (5) staff, four (4) out of the five (5) staff did not know about how a resident gets billed, they only provide medication disbursement. One (1) staff out of the five (5) staff confirmed that residents only get blood withdrawn at the above facility if their insurance covers it. Furthermore, that same staff confirmed if a resident's insurance refused to pay the bill they would get an email saying the resident's insurance was not covering the bill. In addition, that staff also confirmed that R1 gets Medical and Medicare and should not be getting charged for anything. LPA obtained R1's Identification and Emergency Information and Admission Record that confirms R1 gets both Medical and Medicare. Therefore, based on the LPA's observations, staff and resident interviews, the above allegation(s) above is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. An exit interview was conducted, no citation(s) were issued, and a copy of this report was given to the Administrative Service Coordinator. Regarding the allegation: Staff does not ensure residents medications are properly managed. It is being alleged that Resident #1-(R1) received a new pain medication and it was not provided to them. LPA asked for R1's MAR-Medication Administration Record and it was determined by reviewing R1's MAR, that the pain medication was never noted in the facility's medication system and on the MAR. LPA received R1's pain medication prescription from R1's new Health Insurance and the doctor that prescribed it. R1's medication was prescribed on 01/09/26. LPA conducted a physical review of R1's medication and noticed that pain medication was in a bubble pack stored in R1's medication packet in the medical technician's cart and the following dates were missing 01/20/26-01/26/26. It is a morning medication but there was no notation that it was being provided to R1. LPA interviewed the medical technician that confirmed R1's pain medication was provided that morning (01/26/26) but they did not document it anywhere because the new pain medication was not on the MAR list. Although, LPA interviewed sixteen (16) residents that confirm they receive their medication, R1 continues to confirm that they are not receiving their pain medication. LPA interviewed five (5) staff that confirmed that R1 should have been receiving their pain medication but because there was no documentation of R1 receiving their pain medication they cannot determine if R1 ever received it. Therefore, based on the LPA's observations, staff and resident interviews, the above allegation(s) above is SUBSTANTIATED at this time. An exit interview was conducted, citation(s) were issued, an appeals right was provided and a copy of this report was given to the Administrative Service Coordinator.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(d)(4)Type B

    Personnel Requirements: All personnel shall be given on the job training or have related experience with knowledge required to safely assist with prescribed medications. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's observation and interviews, the licensee/administrator did not comply with the section cited above by providing R1 their medication everyday and/or when prescribed which posed a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 26, 2026 inspection of LEISURE VALE ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of LEISURE VALE ASSISTED LIVING on January 26, 2026. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to LEISURE VALE ASSISTED LIVING on January 26, 2026?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Personnel Requirements: All personnel shall be given on the job training or have related experience with knowledge requ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.