Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

IVY PARK AT WEST HILLSLicense 1976105012 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Between 11:00am – 1:00pm, LPAs conducted interviews with the Executive Director, Memory Care Director, Health Care Director, three (3) staff/caregivers, six (6) out of forty-five (45) residents residing at Assisted Living, two (2) family members of residents residing at Memory Care unit and attempted to speak with six (6) out of 15 residents residing at Memory Care unit. Allegation: Staff do not ensure that hazardous items are inaccessible to residents in care. It was alleged that on 4/6/2025, R1 who resides in the Memory Care unit ingested dishwashing soap that was left on the kitchen counter. To investigate this allegation, LPAs conducted interviews with Executive Director and Memory Care Director and both parties interviewed confirmed that S1 diluted dishwashing soap “Dawn” in water and placed the container in the memory care unit kitchen counter unsupervised. During investigation, LPAs reviewed R1’s Physician’s Report (dated on 10/21/2024), where indicated (in Mental Condition section) Confused/Disoriented, Wondering Behavior and At Risk if Allowed Direct Access to Personal Grooming and Hygiene Items due to Dementia. ED and MCD also confirmed that R1 had several episodes of wondering around the MCU during the nighttime. Although, no witnesses were present during the incident, the ED stated that when R1 was taken to the hospital on 4/6/2025 and discharged on the same day, both ED and MCD witnessed that R1 vomited soap like solution that was similar to bubbles. Moreover, during the interview with S1, S1 admitted that because he/she had to do scheduled residents check-up rounds, the mix of dishwashing soap “Dawn” and water was left unattended and accessible to R1. Review of the facility Incident Report revealed that R1 ingested unknown substance consisting of dishwashing soap and water, 911 was immediately contacted and R1 was transferred to the hospital. Lastly, review of Plan of Operation for Dementia Care specifies on page 13, under Safety and Storage of Hazardous Materials: "The materials that may pose a risk to residents, whether through contact or ingestion, are stored securely in locked areas and remain inaccessible to residents. This includes, but not limited to: Laundry and cleaning supplies...". Review of "Dawn" detergent, the Warning label specifies the following, " Warning: Causes eye irritation, do not get in eyes. Keep out of reach of children. Rinse hands throughout after handling. First Aid treatment contains anionic and nonionic surfactants. If in eyes: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing for 15 minutes. If eye irritation persists: Get medical attention. If swallowed, drink a glass of water to dilute". Also, review of training records confirmed that Hazardous Chemicals course was provided and completed by S1 on 12/23/2024. Therefore, based on interviews and records review this allegation is Substantiated. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report delivered.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87309(a)(2)(A)(B)Type A

    Storage Space and Access:(a)Disinfectants, cleaning solutions...shall be stored where inaccessible to clients.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. R1 ingested a chemical detergent left by S1 on the counter in a MCU. This posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87464(f)(1)Type B

    Basic Services: (f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c).This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA’s observation, interview and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as R1 diagnosed as having dementia, and documented instances of wandering nighttime in the MCU, was left unsupervised. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 1, 2025 inspection of IVY PARK AT WEST HILLS?

This was a complaint inspection of IVY PARK AT WEST HILLS on May 1, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to IVY PARK AT WEST HILLS on May 1, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Storage Space and Access:(a)Disinfectants, cleaning solutions...shall be stored where inaccessible to clients.This requi..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.