Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 04/08/25, LPA Ngo-Castaneda conducted an initial complaint visit at which time, at approximately 10:19 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. From 12:30 PM – 1:30 PM, LPA interviewed three (3) staff members present in the facility and five (5) residents. At 11:00 AM, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which included, but not limited to Physician’s report, Admission Agreement, Staff Training, LIC 500, resident roster, needs and service plan, and other relevant documents to the investigation. Before this visit on 4.7.2025, LPA reviewed the documents previously gathered from the facility. Allegation #1: Staff over medicated a resident contributed to resident’s death. It was alleged that facility staff over-medicated resident #1 (R1), resulting/contributing in their death. LPA interviewed five (5) residents on 4.8.2025, and it was revealed that residents do not have any issues with staff over medicating anyone at the facility. During interviews with staff, it was revealed that all medications are given as prescribed. LPA reviewed R1’s medical records, which revealed that on 3.21.2025, no drug overdose was found in R1's system. R1’s death was due to ‘cardiac arrest’ on 4.1.2025. Based on interviews and record review, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation #2: Staff did not keep the facility free of an illegal substance. It was alleged that the facility kept an illegal substance that R1 took and consumed. During LPA Ngo-Castaneda facility plant tour, medication review, and observation, LPA did not observe any ‘illegal substance’ in the facility. During interviews with staff, it was revealed that all medications are given as prescribed. All of the staff confirmed that no one uses or sells drugs in the facility. During interviews with residents, all interviewed residents stated that they were given their medications as prescribed. Residents revealed no occurrences of illegal drug use or sales in the facility. Based on interviews and record review, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Continue to LIC 9099-C Allegation #3: Staff placed a resident on hospice without authorization. It was alleged that R1 was placed on hospice care without their consent. LPA phone interview with R1 family at 12:15 PM on 4.8.2025 revealed that R1’s family was aware of what they signed and was advised on the services that hospice will provide. LPA interview with staff revealed that R1 was admitted at the facility on 1.17.2025. Before being admitted to the facility, R1's family signed and agreed to R1 to receive hospice care. R1’s hospice care was approved by Circle of Life Hospice coverage on 1.01.2025. Based on the information provided and record review, the allegation is deemed to be UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health or safety hazards were observed during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(c)(2)Type A

    Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services. Once ordered by the physician, the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the information obtained during the course of the investigation, staff did not comply with the section cited by failing to ensure R1's Norco medication was given as prescribed, which posed an immediate health and safety and personal rights risk to R1.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 30, 2025 inspection of BEST CARE ASSISTED LIVING ON HASKELL?

This was a complaint inspection of BEST CARE ASSISTED LIVING ON HASKELL on December 30, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to BEST CARE ASSISTED LIVING ON HASKELL on December 30, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.